STAR HardProbes PWG

["Ceska, Jakub" <jakub.ceska AT fjfi.cvut.cz>]

Hello,

thank you very much for your comments! Are there any additional? If not, would it be possible to push the abstract further, as the deadline is nearing?

Best regards,
Jakub

---

Od: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> za uživatele tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Odesláno: úterý 5. listopadu 2024 2:51
Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jakub Ceska for Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review

 

Hello Jakub,

  thanks for implement my comments, I have no further comments and
sign-off.

Qian Yang

On 2024-10-27 23:09, Ceska, Jakub wrote:
> Dear Qian,
>
> thank you very much for your comments! They are implemented in v4 of
> the abstract.
>
> The pT has been studied up to 10 GeV/c for now, but with the BHT2
> dataset it should be viable to include a 10-15 GeV/c bin. The rages
> were included in brackets; please let me know if this is alright, or
> if I should change this.
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
>  Best regards,
> Jakub
>
> -------------------------
>
> Od: tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Odesláno: neděle 27. října 2024 12:44
> Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Kopie: Ceska, Jakub <jakub.ceska AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
> Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jakub Ceska for
> Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review
>
> Hello Jakub,
>    Nice abstract. Please find my comments below:
>
>   First paragraph, you mentioned quarkonium. Then it changes to
> upsilon
> at second paragraph. Better to mention why upsilon is important?
> Larger mass and binding energy give a more precise prediction for
> upsilon than J/Psi.
> In the second part, It will be good to mention the upsilon rapidity
> and
> pT range.
>
> as well as the invariant production cross-section -> as well as the
> inclusive production cross-section.
>
> Qian Yang
>
> On 2024-10-27 14:32, Ceska, Jakub wrote:
>> Dear Isaac,
>>
>> thank you for your comments, I fully agree. I have decided to omit
> the
>> reference of heavy-ion collisions, which is not the focus of this
>> study. I have implemented your comments in the new version (v3).
>>
>> Thank you for your time and sorry for my delay related to travel.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jakub
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> Od: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov>
>> za uživatele Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
>> Odesláno: pátek 25. října 2024 18:04
>> Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>> Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jakub Ceska for
>> Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review
>>
>> Hi Jakub,
>>
>> Nice abstract — it will make a great poster. Please find a few
> small
>> comments below. With these addressed, I sign off.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Isaac
>>
>> The first statement is a bit of a tautology -- "The study of []...is
>> of great interest in understanding []". Maybe "The study of
> quarkonium
>> production in p+p collisions is of great interest in understanding
> the
>> relative importance of mechanisms that contribute to its formation,
>> which is an outstanding question" or something like that. This
>> formulation would probably require breaking the mention of heavy-ion
>> collisions to a separate sentence, especially because it would fit
>> better this way with the sentence which comes after (you might be
> able
>> to merge those two).
>>
>> "during Run17" is unnecessary and can be removed.
>>
>> "larger data sample"
>>
>> On Oct 25, 2024, at 09:37, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
>>
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Jakub Ceska (jakub.ceska AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for
> a
>> review,
>> please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69681
>>
>> Deadline: 2024-10-31
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov