Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Tanmay Pani for Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Tanmay Pani <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com>
  • To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Tanmay Pani for Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review
  • Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:33:42 -0500

HI Issac,

Thanks for the comments. On the p+p front, we would like to have the paper on arxiv by April, but in case that is not possible, then we will show p+p results for inclusive jets and compare them with Au+Au inclusive jets, for which preliminaries don't exist yet. 

Other than that, the comments have been implemented and can be found here:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/abstract_59.pdf

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 5:16 PM Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:
Hi Tanmay,

See below for some comments on your nice abstract.

Thanks,
Isaac

Title: “Observing jet quenching” is a strong statement since we don’t see any effect outside of uncertainties currently.
Same comments from the merged abstract (line numbers refer to the merged draft):
3. Reword for clarity: "Moments of the jet's transverse momentum, p_{\mathrm{T}}, profile in the \eta - \phi plane relative to the jet axis, called generalized jet angularities, are an important class of ... patterns.”
8. "have been performed using inclusive jets in Pb+Pb collisions..." 
9. "using Au+Au collisions"
10. "complementary to that probed”
17. This sentence is starting to get into an awkward middle ground between explaining some of the details of the measurements and not doing so. I would either remove this one, or explain in more detail that we can use peripheral collisions as the baseline for no-to-little medium effect on the angularities and compare to central. Or, have a few sentences explaining the salient details of the measurement including centrality, pT, radius, etc (less recommended since the abstract already seems to be a bit on the long side).
14. I thought we weren’t showing the pp until it’s published because the preliminary had problems. Is the plan to get it published by April?
18. “are differential”


On Oct 28, 2024, at 11:29, Tanmay Pani <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

After merging my talk abstract with Ondrej, I am reuploading the abstract for a poster.

Thanks
Tanmay

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:28 AM <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Tanmay Pani (tp543 AT physics.rutgers.edu) has submitted a material for a 
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69763

Deadline: 2024-10-31
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page