STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Isaac and Priyanka,

On Slide16: we could rephrase that bottom sentence as
"STAR data shows no significant correlations, but the data consistent 
with theoretical model
prediction with emission source size of 5 fm within uncertainty"

What do you think?

Best
Nihar

On 2024-11-21 03:10, Mooney, Isaac wrote:
> Hi Priyanka,
>
> I have no additional comments on your nice slides, pending the
> possible addition on slide 19. One comment to Nihar: on s. 16, I would
> call that consistency between the model (pink) and data across the
> entire domain, within statistical and systematic uncertainty of the
> data and theoretical uncertainty on the model. By eye it looks like <
> 1 sigma deviation of the central value from the model value in the
> lowest k* bin. Maybe the deviation when combining both of the lowest
> two bins gets above 1*sigma, but since the lowest bin is where the
> qualitative behavior of the model is changing, it seems that would be
> the region where we want to know the consistency or lack thereof.
> Priyanka could comment if she has the exact numbers for deviations of
> the data and model as a whole with all bins, and/or just with the
> lowest two where there may be some slight tension, and/or the value
> for the very lowest bin. But to me it seems that what she is trying to
> say is: "yes the data are flat, but within uncertainty, do they also
> support a physical picture which has some effect at low k*? Yes." And
> I think that’s a valid interpretation, given the plot.
>
> Thanks,
> Isaac
>
> > On Nov 18, 2024, at 22:33, tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello Priyanka,
> >
> > Nice Slides. Additional to Nihar's comments, please find my comments
> > below:
> > Slide 4, Please give a reference to this page.
> > Slide 6, it is sqrt(pi) rather than sort(2) in equation (1).
> > Slide 12, If your analysis just used part of the data, then you
> > should mention it.
> > Slide 13, Background is not shown in the plot (either SE-LS or
> > MX-UL)
> > Slide 16,17 and 18, It will be good to point out how you deal with
> > different spin states and its relative fraction.
> >
> > Qian Yang
> >
> > On 2024-11-18 13:14, Nihar Sahoo wrote:
> > Hello Priyanka,
> > Please find my comments on your nice slides.
> > _Slide2: Please provide reference of this cartoon [ALICE
> > experiment’s probably]
> > _Slide16, “STAR data shows no significant correlations, but the
> > data
> > is also consistent with theoretical model
> > predictions with emission source size of 5 fm or larger” -> It is
> > not
> > correct. It is not consistent at low k*. Please correct it.
> > _Similarly in Slide 17, It is consistent within uncertainty at low
> > k*.
> > Please clearly mention it.
> > _Slid18:  “We do not observe significant correlations between D0-p
> > pairs” -> on “Significant correlation”, who do you know this
> > is not
> > significant? I think at low k* we see some correlation., but you
> > have
> > larger bin size so last point only shows this correlation. Is not
> > it?
> > _Slide19:  Either you drop this slide with “place holder” or you
> > finalise this slide  before we sign off.
> > Best
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-11-18 02:50, "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > Please have a look at the submitted slides for the upcoming Zimanyi
> > school. Slides are almost similar as WPCF with a place holder in
> > slide
> > no. 19, which should be finalized soon.
> > Regards,
> > Priyanka
> > -------------------------
> > From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> > <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
> > webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
> > <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
> > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 10:15 PM
> > To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > Subject: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury
> > for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
> > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has
> > submitted
> > a material for a review, please have a look:
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fnode%2F69916&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C803b859d64874d4192bb08dd084af32a%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638675840198846944%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OswFFD3tBYWonMFMr%2Bd0ZFp%2F%2BVswhqlP09%2Fwg0KBQf8%3D&reserved=0
> > [1]
> > Deadline: 2024-12-02
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster@https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.star.bnl.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C803b859d64874d4192bb08dd084af32a%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638675840198869111%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=W8R6TRu0TbzcDbdg9sQ%2FoQwlxv3F63wsnb%2BwwtIUDEg%3D&reserved=0
> > [2]
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69916
> [2] http://www.star.bnl.gov/