STAR HardProbes PWG

["Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>]

Hi Priyanka,

Sorry for my delay. For the record, I am fine with the changes.

Thanks,

Isaac

On Dec 3, 2024, at 03:58, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Barbara and all,

This is a kind reminder to have a look at the updated version of the proceeding. If you have further comments, please let me know. Reviewers would like to get the modified version by today.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 3:52 PM
To: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Cc: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding

 

Hi Barbara and all,

I uploaded the modified version (V6) with implementation of all suggestions. Please have a look.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/SQM_24_V6_P_Roy_Chowdhury.pdf

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 11:44 AM
To: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
Cc: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding

 

Hi Priyanka,

"Figure 1:

) you have purity labels, but you do not discuss them at all. So either remove them or quote them later on where you explain Eq.(2). It is better maybe to remove them , because in these plots you show only D0 candidates, while you refer to the purity in terms of D0-identified hadron pairs. If in the figure you quote the D0 purity, write it clearly in the caption and/or in the text.   —--> I mentioned about D0 purity right above the fig 1, this comment is unclear to me"

I think the point made here is not what is the purity, but how/where it is used. You can name it on the plot as "D0 signal purity" to be consistent with the text.

And when you write about the D0 signal purity above the figure, you can mention it is used to calculate the pari purity as detailed in Sec. 3.

Cheers,

Barbara

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 11:33 AM Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Hi Barbara,

Thanks for the clarification. Would you also provide your thoughts on other comments (for which I made my response in bold)?

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 11:28 AM
To: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
Cc: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding

 

Hi Priyanka,

You don't need to add the STAR label. But the system and energy would indeed be useful.

Cheers,

Barbara

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 11:21 AM Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Hi Qian,

Thanks for your feedback. I also have same understanding about using "STAR" label on a plot. I am looking forward to the feedback from Barbara and others.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 11:15 AM
To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com<barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding

 

Hello Priyanka

  I am ok with these reply.
Figure 1 does not delivering physics information, I do not saw a plot 
with "STAR" on it before.
Probably Barbara can give comments on this and give a decision.

Qian

On 2024-11-30 21:08, "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" wrote:
> Dear Convenors and all,
> 
>  I received the following comments on my SQM proceeding. I implemented
> most of those and uploaded V5 in the same node as previous one.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68859
> 
>  Please find my responses to these comments and questions.
> 
>  Abstract: particle emit and the -> are emitted and on the  ---> DONE
>  Abstract: Such correlations ... in the hadronic phase. -> this
> sentence has to be rephrased in the sense of clearly stating that the
> correlations can bring information about the interaction of charm
> quarks with the QGP medium and of charmed hadrons in the hadronic
> rescattering phase. ---> I am not sure if I can make this statement as
> we don't have any theory model which can connect the findings through
> femtoscopy at final state can connect the interaction at initial
> stages, so kept the line unchanged
>  page 1: In the early ... establishment [1]. -> Heavy quarks such as
> charm (c) and its charge conjugate (c-bar) are created in the early
> stages of ultra-relativistic collisions of heavy ions. Therefore, they
> probe all stages of the evolution of heavy-ion collisions -
> Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP), hadronization, chemical and kinetic
> freeze-out.  ----> DONE
>  page 1: remove the sentence with the big bang. It is not really
> linked to the rest of the text.   —-> DONE
>  page 1: interact with the medium -> which medium? QGP? Than clearly
> state it    ----> DONE
> page 1: paarticular -> particular   -----> DONE
> page 1: Phase... [5]. -> Phase-space evolution of emission source and
> final-state interactions can be both studied with such measurements in
> heavy-ion collisions [5]. ------> DONE
> page 2: suggest to remove the branching ratio -> Kpi. Moreover, 'and
> set of topological criteria' is somehow not linked to the rest of the
> sentence -> rephrase   ------> DONE
> page 2: Fig.1 shows the reconstructed D0 and D0-bar invariant mass
> distributions using STAR data of Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200
> GeV [4].   —---> DONE
> page 2: remove 'for this study'   —----> DONE
> Figure 1:
>  _) you have purity labels, but you do not discuss them at all. So
> either remove them or quote them later on where you explain Eq.(2). It
> is better maybe to remove them , because in these plots you show only
> D0 candidates, while you refer to the purity in terms of D0-identified
> hadron pairs. If in the figure you quote the D0 purity, write it
> clearly in the caption and/or in the text.   —--> __I mentioned
> about D0 purity right above the fig 1, this comment is unclear to me_
>  ) Add Au+Au, sqrt(s_NN) and STAR label   —---> Can I put "STAR" in
> the inv mass plots??
>  _) red curved should be added to the legend  ----> Not yet
> implemented_
>  ) caption: you discuss here for the first time the LS pairs. This
> should be properly addressed in the text. Moreover, it is not clear
> whether the red curves are a result from the LS subtraction, or just
> results from the fitting procedure. Note also that the black points
> are US, but what happens is that the US background can be described
> well with LS pairs. Please revise the caption and the corresponding
> text to avoid confusions.   —---> Modified
> page 2: The computed value of the correlation function can be affected
> ---> DONE
> page 2: identifying -> identified  -------> DONE
> page 3: 'to reduce contamination ... present in the system' -> this is
> a bit hard to ready, if you can please rephrase to make clearer.  --->
> DONE
> page 3: n-sigma -> you have to explain that you discuss PID here and
> describe what is it.  ---> Rephrased with a reference, but looking for
> a better reference
> page 4: Theory calculations... pairs [9]. -> Please write properly
> that in the left panel the theory predictions are for a mixture of
> D0-pi+ and D+-pi0 and in the right panel for D0-K+ pairs.  -----> DONE
> page 4: what do you mean by 'at the origin'?  -----> Modified
> 
>  The reviewer informed me that they intend to finalize the proceeding
> by Dec 3rd but I received the comments not much earlier. So, apologize
> for the last moment rush.
> 
>  Please let me know if you have any questions and comments to address.
> 
> 
>  Regards,
>  Priyanka