STAR QA Board

["Duckworth, Emilie" <educkwor@kent.edu>]

ok, sounds good! 

here is the final list then for Takahito to review:

new list	Chenliang marked bad	Emmy marked bad
22035002	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22038009	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22039013	runidvsavgphi	run_vs_avg_phi
22039028	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22043046	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22043047	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22044003	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22044004	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22044005	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22046006	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_sdca_xy
22046012	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22047008	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22048040	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_avg_eta
22048042	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22049026	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22049027	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22049029	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22050003	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22050040	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22050044	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22050045	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22051014	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22052032	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052033	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052035	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052036	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052048	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22053022	runidvsavgphi	#N/A
22054007	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22054022	runidvsavgeta	#N/A
22054028	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22054030	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22054042	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22055023	runidvsavgdedx runidvsavgsdcaxy	#N/A
22058037	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22059005	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22061012	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22061015	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22062034	runidvsavgeta runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_avg_eta run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22062035	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22062036	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_avg_eta run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22063014	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22064025	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22064038	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22065014	runidvsavgsdcaxy runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22065015	runidvsavgsdcaxy runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22067039	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22068012	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22068041	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22069032	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22069034	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22069040	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22070040	runidvsavgsdcaxy runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22071036	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22074042	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22076033	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22076034	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22077050	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22078016	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22078032	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22079027	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22084029	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22084035	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22085009	runidvsavgphi runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22085021	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22086027	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22087027	runidvsavgeta runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22088034	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22091018	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22093029	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22095027	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22096003	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22096037	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22097016	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta run_vs_avg_dedx
22097030	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22098054	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22099024	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22099042	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22100045	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22102034	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22103027	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22103032	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22104027	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22105030	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22106032	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22108050	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22109032	runidvsrefmultgt20 runidvsavgphi	run_vs_avg_phi run_vs_refmult
22111047	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22112021	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22113001	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22113029	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx run_vs_sdca_xy
22115008	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22115019	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22115032	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22116007	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22116008	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22116025	runidvsavgdedx runidvsavgphi	run_vs_avg_dedx
22116026	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22116030	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22117023	runidvsavgphi	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22118058	runidvsrefmultgt20 runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_refmult
22039010	#N/A	run_vs_refmult
22069030	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy
22069033	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy
22070007	#N/A	run_vs_refmult
22074009	#N/A	run_vs_refmult
22110025	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22115004	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22050038	added because of tommy's comment
22070001	added because part of refmult cluster
22070002	added because part of refmult cluster
22070003	added because part of refmult cluster
22070004	added because part of refmult cluster
22070005	added because part of refmult cluster
22070006	added because part of refmult cluster
22070007	added because part of refmult cluster
22070008	added because part of refmult cluster
22070009	added because part of refmult cluster
22070010	added because part of refmult cluster
22070011	added because part of refmult cluster
22070012	added because part of refmult cluster
22070014	added because part of refmult cluster
22070040	added because part of refmult cluster
22070041	added because part of refmult cluster

Emmy

---

From: Ma, Rongrong <marr@bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 12:02 PM
To: Duckworth, Emilie <educkwor@kent.edu>
Cc: Muhammad Abdulhamid via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: EXT: Re: [STAR-QAboard] badrun cluster from refmult QA plot @7.7 GeV

 

Hello Emmy

Thanks for looking into this in detail. I would still like to suggest to add these two groups to bad run list. The reason the second group was marked as good is that they are fine within their own region. However, the centrality calibration is not typically done for different regions, which means the calibration parameters based on the majority of data are not suitable for this particular group of runs. The effect is small, but I do not think it is correct in principle. This is also why I suggested to perform only global rejection for refMult with a tighter criterion. 

Thanks. 

Best

Rongrong

On Jun 26, 2023, at 2:07 PM, Duckworth, Emilie via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello all,

At Friday's meeting, we arrived at the conclusion that we should move forward with the badrun list presented, with the addition of a cluster of events seen in the refmult QA plot that looked like they were arbitrarily included as "good" when they shouldn't have been.

Zooming into that section, it is clear why some were marked as good and some were marked as bad. There were 2 run number clusters close together, one that averaged around 100, with a few dropping down to 90, and one that averaged around 90 for the whole cluster. it was the few dropping down to 90 that were marked as bad, and the neighboring cluster, which were all consistent with each other were all marked as good. A detail that was not clear from such a zoomed out plot. 

With this in mind, I propose we do NOT add this cluster to the bad runs list, and continue one with the list presented at Friday's meeting, no edits. except for ones suggested by Takahito as a third party review.

Emmy

<refmultgt20_2023-06-26.png>_______________________________________________
STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l

CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER Do not click any links, open any attachments, or REPLY to the message unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.