STAR QA Board

["Tsang, Chun Yuen" <ctsang@bnl.gov>]

Hi Emmy,

 

These are the things I found on shift log. Runs that do not appear here correspond to runs where I found nothing on the shift log.

 

22035002 ETOF sector 18 low hits.

22038009 L4 running despite run stopped.

22039013 TPX[8] rebooted. ETOF 19-2 empty.

22039028 No BEMC

22043046 RHIC hit beam pipe

22043047 eTOR removed

22044003 BEMC LV trip, unusual TPC Charge_Phi spikes

22044004 No BTOW

22044005 Not BTOW, ETOF EVB ERR

22046006 Vertex_z spiking at -200 cm

22047008 Beam lost, All TPC anode cathode and eTOF HV tripped

22048042 Spike in event rate, eTOF iTPC tripped.

22049026 ETOF EVB ERR

22049027 Trigger rate drop mid run

22049029 ETOF EVB ERR. DAQ ERR mid run

22050003 No BTOW, 3 missing columns in eTOF digi density plot.

22050040 BEMC box 11 has many time outs.

22050044 BTOW LV box 11 has tons of timeouts.

22050045 BTOW box 11 is out

22051014 ETOF all sector HV trip, iTPC TPX 96% dead

22052033 Coherence event, lost half of one beam. Dead time from TPX, iTPC and ETOF.

22052036 11 min short run. Beam abort during squeeze.

22052048 Trigger 100% dead.

22054028 Shift leader observed very high backgrounds.

22054030 FCS 100% dead.

22058037 ETOF EVB ERR

22059005 Unexpected beam abort. TPC HV tripped

22061012 BTOW issues

22062034 z vertex shifted.

22062035 Shift leader observed high background.

22062036 Shift leader observed high background.

22063014 New dead area in BEMC.

22064025 TPC and iTPC 100% busy

22065014 Tune drifted, backgrounds way up

22065015 Blue backgrounds high

22068041 eTOF busy, didn't stop for beam dump.

22070040 Beam hitting top of beam pipe.

22076033 TPC anode sector 6 ch 7 tripped

22076034 holes appear in BTOW

22078032 GMT HV alarm. u3 became black.

22084029 Two cold tiles in EPD

22091018 MarkedJunk Shift leader marked as junk

22093029 Noise in iTPC sector 1

22097016 short after mask iTPC sector 7, RDO 2

22097030 EPD had cold tile, ETOF had a column out.

22099042 Beam lost with only 500 hlt good events.

22106032 MCR unable to achieve full store.

22109032 Extra hot sectors in TPC due to crate vme 55 being on.

22111047 Lots of ETOF modules are blank in digi density plot.

22112021 Empty boxes in BEMC, hot tower.

22113001 TOF was in standby

22113029 4 modules out for eTOF.

22115008 Unexpected beam abort

22115019 Beam abort

22115032 No cooling for this store. Missing eTOF strips

22116007 BTOW HP trip

22116025 iTPC RDO S20:3 keeps on restarting.

22116026 Short run

22116030 eTOF 20-2, 20-3 missing

22118058 TPC gas alarm, missing EPD tiles, VME crate is off.

22039010 TPX[8] died/rebotted

22069033 ETOF 19-1-2 is out

22074009 Short run, iTPC S3 RDO 2 failed.

22050038 BTOW tripes. Run ended early.

22070001 BTOW removed

22070004 eTOF 19.1 disappeared.

 

Best wishes,

Tommy

 

From: STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l-bounces@lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Duckworth, Emilie via STAR-QAboard-l
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 3:19 PM
To: Ma, Rongrong <marr@bnl.gov>
Cc: Muhammad Abdulhamid via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [STAR-QAboard] EXT: Re: badrun cluster from refmult QA plot @7.7 GeV

 

ok, sounds good! 

 

here is the final list then for Takahito to review:

 

new list	Chenliang marked bad	Emmy marked bad
22035002	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22038009	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22039013	runidvsavgphi	run_vs_avg_phi
22039028	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22043046	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22043047	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22044003	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22044004	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22044005	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22046006	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_sdca_xy
22046012	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22047008	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22048040	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_avg_eta
22048042	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22049026	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22049027	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22049029	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22050003	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22050040	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22050044	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22050045	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22051014	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22052032	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052033	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052035	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052036	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22052048	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22053022	runidvsavgphi	#N/A
22054007	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22054022	runidvsavgeta	#N/A
22054028	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22054030	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22054042	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22055023	runidvsavgdedx runidvsavgsdcaxy	#N/A
22058037	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22059005	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22061012	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22061015	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22062034	runidvsavgeta runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_avg_eta run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22062035	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22062036	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_avg_eta run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22063014	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22064025	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22064038	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22065014	runidvsavgsdcaxy runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22065015	runidvsavgsdcaxy runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22067039	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22068012	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22068041	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22069032	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22069034	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22069040	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22070040	runidvsavgsdcaxy runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22071036	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22074042	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22076033	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22076034	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22077050	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22078016	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22078032	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22079027	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22084029	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22084035	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22085009	runidvsavgphi runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22085021	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22086027	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22087027	runidvsavgeta runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22088034	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22091018	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22093029	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22095027	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22096003	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22096037	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22097016	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta run_vs_avg_dedx
22097030	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22098054	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22099024	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22099042	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22100045	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22102034	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22103027	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22103032	runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	#N/A
22104027	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22105030	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22106032	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22108050	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22109032	runidvsrefmultgt20 runidvsavgphi	run_vs_avg_phi run_vs_refmult
22111047	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22112021	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22113001	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22113029	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx run_vs_sdca_xy
22115008	runidvsavgeta	run_vs_avg_eta
22115019	runidvsavgsdcaxy	run_vs_sdca_xy
22115032	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22116007	runidvsavgdedx	#N/A
22116008	runidvsrefmultgt20	run_vs_refmult
22116025	runidvsavgdedx runidvsavgphi	run_vs_avg_dedx
22116026	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22116030	runidvsavgdedx	run_vs_avg_dedx
22117023	runidvsavgphi	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22118058	runidvsrefmultgt20 runidvsavgsdcaxyrms	run_vs_refmult
22039010	#N/A	run_vs_refmult
22069030	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy
22069033	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy
22070007	#N/A	run_vs_refmult
22074009	#N/A	run_vs_refmult
22110025	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22115004	#N/A	run_vs_sdca_xy_rms
22050038	added because of tommy's comment
22070001	added because part of refmult cluster
22070002	added because part of refmult cluster
22070003	added because part of refmult cluster
22070004	added because part of refmult cluster
22070005	added because part of refmult cluster
22070006	added because part of refmult cluster
22070007	added because part of refmult cluster
22070008	added because part of refmult cluster
22070009	added because part of refmult cluster
22070010	added because part of refmult cluster
22070011	added because part of refmult cluster
22070012	added because part of refmult cluster
22070014	added because part of refmult cluster
22070040	added because part of refmult cluster
22070041	added because part of refmult cluster

 

 

Emmy

---

From: Ma, Rongrong <marr@bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 12:02 PM
To: Duckworth, Emilie <educkwor@kent.edu>
Cc: Muhammad Abdulhamid via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: EXT: Re: [STAR-QAboard] badrun cluster from refmult QA plot @7.7 GeV

 

Hello Emmy

 

Thanks for looking into this in detail. I would still like to suggest to add these two groups to bad run list. The reason the second group was marked as good is that they are fine within their own region. However, the centrality calibration is not typically done for different regions, which means the calibration parameters based on the majority of data are not suitable for this particular group of runs. The effect is small, but I do not think it is correct in principle. This is also why I suggested to perform only global rejection for refMult with a tighter criterion. 

 

Thanks. 

 

Best

Rongrong

On Jun 26, 2023, at 2:07 PM, Duckworth, Emilie via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

 

Hello all,

 

At Friday's meeting, we arrived at the conclusion that we should move forward with the badrun list presented, with the addition of a cluster of events seen in the refmult QA plot that looked like they were arbitrarily included as "good" when they shouldn't have been.

 

Zooming into that section, it is clear why some were marked as good and some were marked as bad. There were 2 run number clusters close together, one that averaged around 100, with a few dropping down to 90, and one that averaged around 90 for the whole cluster. it was the few dropping down to 90 that were marked as bad, and the neighboring cluster, which were all consistent with each other were all marked as good. A detail that was not clear from such a zoomed out plot. 

 

With this in mind, I propose we do NOT add this cluster to the bad runs list, and continue one with the list presented at Friday's meeting, no edits. except for ones suggested by Takahito as a third party review.

 

 

 

Emmy

<refmultgt20_2023-06-26.png>_______________________________________________
STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l

 

CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER Do not click any links, open any attachments, or REPLY to the message unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.