Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-qaboard-l - Re: [STAR-QAboard] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 10/May/2024 at noon 12 EDT

star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR QA Board

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ray, Robert L" <ray@physics.utexas.edu>
  • To: star-qaboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>, EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn@u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
  • Subject: Re: [STAR-QAboard] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 10/May/2024 at noon 12 EDT
  • Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:36:28 +0000

Hi ShinIchi:

Yes, when the step is about as large as the rest of
the distribution it means that tracks from pileup events
are dominant.  This is what we have seen in previous 
years with proton-proton beams.

The shift reports are saying the drift speed is about
5.5 cm/micro-sec, so the drift time is about 36 mu-sec.

Thanks for asking,
Lanny

From: STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l-bounces@lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of EsumiShinIchi via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 12:01 PM
To: star-qaboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [STAR-QAboard] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 10/May/2024 at noon 12 EDT
 
Dear Gene
Thanks for the explanation of the big step at the middle of z distribution of tpc hit. 
The reason why I asked was the step is just about factor of two compared to the 
outer z region, which sounded like they are all actual good hits, but just plotted 
overlapped at the middle caused by the long drift time converted to the z position. 
But you say they are mostly caused by pile-up, does this mean the most of the 
recorded hits are pile-up hits compared to the real hits from the triggered collision, 
even in this low luminosity of ~40kHz leveled rate? Could you please remind me 
the full drift timeof 2m (close to 50 us)? A few pile up (within this time window) in 
each event might be real collisions though… Thanks again. 
Best regards, ShinIchi 

On May 11, 2024, at 0:59, Ray, Robert L via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear QA team,

Sorry for today's confusion about the QA meeting. I did not
communicate with Ashik about what fast-offline intended
to present.

Richard's presentation from last week and today may be
found at my QA blog:


Lanny

From: STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l-bounces@lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of ASHIK IKBAL via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 4:19 PM
To: star-qaboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [STAR-QAboard] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 10/May/2024 at noon 12 EDT
 
Dear All,

We will have our weekly QA board meeting this Friday
(10/May/2024) at noon 12 EDT.  Please let me know if you would like to present. 


Zoom connection details:
Join ZoomGov Meeting

Thanks,
Ashik


-- 
Ashik Ikbal
Research Scientist
Kent State University
(stationed at Brookhaven National Laboratory)
Department Of Physics
Kent, OH 44242, USA
Contact no.s: +1 631-504-7647 (USA)
                      +91 8250216234 (India)
Alternate e-mails: asheikh2@kent.edu
                             ashik@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov
                             ashik.ikbal.sheikh@cern.ch
_______________________________________________
STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page