STAR task force for evaluating tracking efficiency uncertainty

["Fisyak, Yuri V" <fisyak AT bnl.gov>]

Hi Dave, I don’t understand why are you talking about GMT simulation ?

As I know there is no such thing yet.

   GMT has no effect on tracks. It should be approximately the same no. of track in both dev and .DEV2.

It is good idea to run GMT cluster finder side by side in dev and .DEV2 version and see the differences.

 

 

                                                              Yuri Fisyak

STAR                                           Phone: +1 631 344 3913
Brookhaven National Laboratory  Fax:    +1 631 344 4206
510A/1-161
http://www.star.bnl.gov/~fisyak       E-mail: fisyak AT bnl.gov

 

 

 

From: Star-tf-trkeff-l <star-tf-trkeff-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of David Stewart via Star-tf-trkeff-l <star-tf-trkeff-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Reply-To: David Stewart <david.j.stewart AT yale.edu>, STAR task force for evaluating tracking efficiency uncertainty <star-tf-trkeff-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Date: Monday, April 12, 2021 at 5:57 PM
To: STAR task force for evaluating tracking efficiency uncertainty <star-tf-trkeff-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Star-tf-trkeff-l] RE Cluster groups

 

Hi Grigory, Yuri, et al.,

 

I need to investigate why there are no many more tracks in the dev2 vs the dev version for the GMT simulation. It has been suggested that I should try at the cluster level. Is the best way to proceed to edit a local copy of the StGmtClusterMaker.cxx under the StGmtClusterMaker::Make function? (If this is a good starting location, I can also run small jobs and hopefully utilize the generous baked-in `LOG_INFO` information to compare between the version.

 

Thanks for your continued support. We talked about this last Tuesday, and there was some advice for a few ins, but a lot of other things have happened this week and having a good entry point will be immensely helpful,

 

Thanks,

Dave