Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-tf-tunepy-l - Re: [Star-tf-tunepy-l] PYTHIA Tuning Discussion Wed. 6/16

star-tf-tunepy-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR task force for tuning PYTHIA

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Fatemi, Renee" <rhfate2 AT g.uky.edu>
  • To: Matthew Kelsey <mkelsey AT wayne.edu>, STAR task force for tuning PYTHIA <star-tf-tunepy-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-tf-tunepy-l] PYTHIA Tuning Discussion Wed. 6/16
  • Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:45:29 -0400

Hi Matt,

Unfortunately I don't think I will be able to attend tomorrow - so many conflicting meetings.  But I will be really interested to hear what Christian says. Will we have a 3pm meeting tomorrow and if so will you summarize your discussion there?

Thanks,
Renee

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:26 AM Matthew Kelsey via Star-tf-tunepy-l <star-tf-tunepy-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi all,

As promised here are some discussion slides for tomorrow if there are any comments/suggestions. 

Cheers,
Matt

——————————
Matthew Kelsey 
Postdoctoral Fellow
Wayne State University
<he/him/his>


On Jun 14, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Matthew Kelsey via Star-tf-tunepy-l <star-tf-tunepy-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi all,

I just wanted to remind you this Wed. at 10 am BNL time we will have the discussion with Christian and maybe a few other PYTHIA folks (connection details below). 

Since we won’t have our regular meeting before, I propose the following:

- I will present more-or-less the same material as used for the cold QCD PWG meeting, except for jet material. (Base tune + forward rapidity observations)
- Zilong, if you don’t mind, could you also present your jet 510 GeV studies and add in the 200 GeV plots from Dmitry? (Jet studies)

I think we have a nice discussion in the cold QCD PWG meeting and received some good feedback from our collaborations (summarized below). I think a few of these questions we can discuss with Christian too along.

- Why Monash? Could we try some more recent LHC tunes as a starting point (also see PDF point below)?
- Having separate mid-rapidity and forward-rapidity tunes can be problematic. Can we try (simultaneously) tuning other parameters, e.g., coupling to ISR which will modify forward observables, or intrinsic kT?
- Observation of PYTHIA 8 w/ NNPDF2.3 not getting jet cross-section is not too supposing (compared to CTEQ6L1). Other LHC tunes with newer PDF sets might be a better starting point.

 Please let me know if there are other things to discuss or add. I will prepare slides and send tomorrow.

Cheers,
Matt

——————————
Matthew Kelsey 
Postdoctoral Fellow
Wayne State University
<he/him/his>

Pass: startune

_______________________________________________
Star-tf-tunepy-l mailing list
Star-tf-tunepy-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-tf-tunepy-l

_______________________________________________
Star-tf-tunepy-l mailing list
Star-tf-tunepy-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-tf-tunepy-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page