Star-tpc-l mailing list

["Van Buren, Gene" <gene AT bnl.gov>]

I just checked the log files of 1436 st_physics files that completed 
FastOffline over the past 36 hours, and of those, 3 had the missing iTPC 
issue....

1 st_physics and 1 st_physics_adc file (2 total files) from run 25151063 had 
the issue
1 st_physics_adc file from run 25151058 had the issue

-Gene


> On May 30, 2024, at 4:22 PM, Van Buren, Gene via Star-tpc-l 
> <star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the brainstorming, Flemming...
> 
>> On May 30, 2024, at 3:58 PM, videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> 
>> One question to think about is
>> - does this ever happen if files are processed later? If that does not 
>> happen it must be due to environment of running.
> 
> I have only on a couple occasions re-run a job myself. Neither time was the 
> problematic job problematic when I processed it. To make things more 
> confusing, jobs that ran later in FastOffline for the same run also had 
> issues. See this list of jobs for run 25149018 sorted by their job start 
> time (EDT) on Tuesday, where the jobs with an asterisk * showed the issue:
> 
>  08:52:02 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1400010
>  08:53:30 st_physics_25149018_raw_0900002
>  08:53:34 st_physics_25149018_raw_0700003
>  08:53:48 st_physics_25149018_raw_2200003
> * 09:12:59 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1700009
>  09:13:51 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_2100010
>  09:14:01 st_physics_25149018_raw_2100002
>  09:14:08 st_physics_25149018_raw_0200002
>  09:14:28 st_physics_25149018_raw_1000002
>  09:15:12 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_0500007
>  09:15:21 st_physics_25149018_raw_1600002
>  09:15:27 st_physics_25149018_raw_1900002
>  09:15:43 st_physics_25149018_raw_0300003
>  09:34:02 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1600005
>  09:34:07 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_2000006
>  09:35:18 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_2200006
>  12:15:00 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1700009  <==== ME RE-PROCESSING THE 
> EARLIER PROBLEMATIC JOB
> * 20:17:20 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_0400008
>  20:31:24 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_0900010
>  20:31:35 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1500009
>  20:33:16 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1100005
>  20:35:34 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1300007
>  20:35:46 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1000010
>  20:57:01 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1900007
>  21:11:17 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_2300009
> * 21:55:38 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_1200008
>  22:14:20 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_2400009
>  22:41:31 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_0700009
>  23:44:11 st_physics_adc_25149018_raw_0800009
> 
>> - What triggers do fast offline use?
> 
> No selection of triggers. Everything in the DAQ files, but only for certain 
> DAQ file streams.
> 
>> - fastoffline do analyze both physics and adc_physics , yes?
> 
> Yes, though st_physics_adc has offline TPC cluster-finding turned on. I 
> can't remember whether I fully determined that you no longer need this for 
> the TPC QA you and Isaac set up, but at first I found we did need it.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Gene
> 
>> 
>> Flemming
>> 
>> 
>> On 2024-05-30 15:48, Van Buren, Gene wrote:
>>> There were many points ;-)
>>>> On May 30, 2024, at 3:45 PM, videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>> Could it be dependent on what node it was running?
>>>> On 2024-05-30 15:38, Van Buren, Gene wrote:
>>>>> - No correlation with farm node on which the jobs ran
>>> There are many farm nodes, but in fact in the run I studied, a single
>>> node happened to process good job and one problematic job.
>>> -Gene
>> 
>> -- 
>> Flemming Videbaek
>> senior scientist, emeritus
>> videbaek @ bnl.gov
>> Brookhaven National Lab
>> Physics Department
>> Bldg 510D
>> Upton, NY 11973
>> 
>> phone: 631-344-4106
>> cell     :  631-681-1596
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Star-tpc-l mailing list
> Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-tpc-l