U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[David W Miller <davemilr AT uchicago.edu>]

Hi Mike,

Thanks a lot for sending this again. 

However, I don’t see a statement that refines the message made in Point #5 on page 1. In today’s discussion, we went over how this is “meant” to really refer to the overcoming of technical and technological hurdles, not that we are literally ready to begin construction (the phrasing from the PO in that discussion was much better than what I’ve repeated here). I thought that this was particularly useful and important. Do we have that more nuanced message somewhere in this word Doc, and I have just missed it?

Thanks,

David

On 16 Jul, 2019, at 09:30, Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net> wrote:

Hi All,

I believe this went out to you some time back, but it may be worth sending this out again. It is notes from Mark Coles and Rebecca Yasky based on their attendance at the CMS Director’s Review. There may be some points that are relevant to your systems.

PO

<NSF feedback to ATLAS on CMS on Directors Review 190518.docx>_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l