Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] L2 / L3 slide templates?

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Tae Min Hong <tmhong AT cern.ch>, "Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] L2 / L3 slide templates?
  • Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 15:21:57 +0200


Hello Tae et al,

Attached is my proposal for the title slide. Here are answers to your other questions:


Do we need to put charge # on each slide? I remember doing so before.


I put these on the section separators mainly, but yes, I think it's good to add these. (I agree that with this very detailed charge it's a little painful.)



Also, I wanted to triple confirm that we are having a set of two slides:

- Management slides with very short 1-2 page summary of technical

Correct.

- Technical slides with very short 1-2 page summary of who's involved

Yes, good point: the slide that explains technical expertise of the people involved goes with the technical part as well as management part.

Best,

Gustaaf

Attachment: 2019-09-11-FDR-titleslide.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document



  • Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] L2 / L3 slide templates?, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/10/2019

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page