U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hello,

Thanks for filing the variance reports.  Here are some comments, please 
follow-up soon.

-6.4 typo: filling => falling
-6.4.1 is missing
-6.4.2 "since the COVID-related BCPs do not take them into account” => that’s 
your choice though; I would remove that comment.  The corrective action is 
not a really a corrective action, but fine…
-6.4.3 looks fine to me

-6.5: "which is very unlikely to be exceeded” is a bit ambiguous in my view, 
maybe “used up” is better than exceeded?
-6.5.1 and 6.5.3 look fine to me

-6.6: no cost variance report is needed, so don’t file one.  Please quantify 
the main contributions to the schedule variance
-6.6.1: maybe better to say "The cost savings due to raw parts will *likely* 
be compensated”
-6.6.3: there’s no request for a cost variance anymore, so either don’t file 
one, or explain it should be there but isn’t due to an accrual issue.  It’s 
been almost 6 months that the submission was going to happen in the next few 
months…
-6.6.4: reading the explanation I expected something in the corrective action 
about the large scale test stand…
-6.6.5 looks good to me

-6.8.2 and 3 look fine to me

-6.10.2 is missing

Thanks,

Gustaaf