Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Comments on August VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Cc: Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, Tim Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Comments on August VRs
  • Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:52:54 -0400


Hello all,

A few comments

-6.4 (and 6.4.1): I’ll approve for now, but I think the LAr-specific VL+ modules are only due in Sept 23 for preproduction, and 2024 for production, so we will need to fix the schedule for rebaseline.  Also please remember that “dominated” is not good enough -you need to give an approximate fraction.  (Since this is in the VR for 6.4.1 let’s leave it this time.)

-6.4.3 has not been submitted so I can’t approve it.

-6.8 is fine

-6.10.2: too much cut and paste: "which is reflected in an ~$9k reduction in the cumulative positive variance since last month” is probably from last month, as it’s +22k this month…  I unlocked that.

Best,

Gustaaf

On Sep 26, 2022, at 11:12 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:


Hello all,

This is becoming critical.

-6.4, 6.4.2 are still missing
-6.4.1 is still not submitted
-6.4.3: please remove the schedule variance parts since the SV is below reporting threshold

-6.8 is still missing
-6.10.2 is still missing

Thx

Gustaaf


On Sep 22, 2022, at 3:43 PM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:


Hello all,

First of all, please *submit* your reports!  I will reject them if I think they need to be edited.

Here are some comments on the August VRs:

-6.4, 6.4.2, 6.4.3 are missing.  Please set yourself a reminder - these things are due on the 20th of the month.

-6.4.1: I assume at NSF rebaseline we will also shift the VTRx+ purchase?  This should really have been moved to avoid having this huge variance…

-6.5.3 looks good

-6.6, 6.6.4, 6.6.5 look good

-6.6.3: "We plan to package and test ~3k chips for sMDT detectors”  sounds like that’s all you’ll ever do…

-6.8 is missing

-6.8.3 looks good

-6.10.2 is missing

Best,

Gustaaf
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l


_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page