usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Questions about scientific labor for the NSF review
- From: Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>
- To: "usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Questions about scientific labor for the NSF review
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 16:50:23 +0000
| Hi NSF L2s and Deputies, 
 As you know the NSF review has a charge question on scientific (uncosted) labor. I have a slide in my overview that you might comment on, and a backup slide with more detail that may interest you. 
 
 Notice that I said there are no difficulties obtaining the planned scientific technical labor – if that is not true let me know (with some details). 
 Thanks, Mike 
 In the overview talk (data compiled from the cost books): 
 
 
 
 In the backup slides (data compiled from the cost books): 
 
 | 
- 
        [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Questions about scientific labor	for the NSF review,
        Michael Tuts, 03/26/2023
- 
            
            Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Questions about scientific labor for the NSF review,
            John Parsons, 03/26/2023
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Questions about scientific labor for the NSF review, Thomas Schwarz, 03/27/2023
 
 
- 
            
            Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Questions about scientific labor for the NSF review,
            John Parsons, 03/26/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.
 
                
