usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports comments

From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Cc: Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, "Schwienhorst, Reinhard" <schwier AT msu.edu>, Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports comments
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:07:16 +0200

Hello all,

Here are some comments on the March variance reports.

Best,

Gustaaf

-6.4 is missing
-6.4.1: looks good, approved
-6.4.2/3 are missing

-6.5, 6.5.3 look good, approved
-6.5.4.1 looks good but needs to be submitted for me to approve

-6.6 is missing
-6.6.1: about $300k of schedule variance is unexplained in the explanation,
but then shows up in impact. I’ll unlock so you can add a sentence.
-6.6.3: looks good, approved
-6.6.4 is missing
-6.6.5: looks good, approved

-6.8 is missing
-6.8.3: looks good, approved
-6.8.4: looks good, approved, but one question: in the agile world, you
should be able to make the GNN change without incurring a schedule penalty,
no?

-6.10.2 is missing

[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports comments, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 04/24/2023
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports comments, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 04/26/2023