Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] April VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] April VRs
  • Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 10:04:19 +0200


Hello all,

I have approved most of the submitted variance reports. A few
comments/exceptions:

-6.4*: all good

-6.5.4 is missing - it looks like Haleh may have let her BNL ID expire?
Maybe she can send her VR to Penka so it can be entered while she is
resolving the issue?

-6.6.3: “The cost variance is due to less effort spent on miniDAQ and TDC
tests on new mezz cards due to delays from other institutions” how does a
delay lead to a positive cost variance? Note that this text should be
removed anyway as the variance is below 100k. I have unlocked this.
-6.6.4: you forgot the impact and CR for the schedule variance. I have
unlocked this.
-6.6.5: I’ve approved, but if the v2 prorotypes are the same as
pre-production, aren’t they pre-production (as should be the case after FDR
approval)?

-6.8 is missing
-6.8.3 is good
-6.8.4 is missing

Best,

Gustaaf






  • [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] April VRs, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 05/22/2024

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page