U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hello all, Today’s follow-up: -6. 4: I have approved -6. 4. 1: I have approved -6. 4. 3 still need fixing -6. 6. 3 was submitted but empty, I have unlocked. (Trying to get this closed out so you don’t have to file VRs anymore. ) -6. 6. 4 still needs fixing

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

 

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hello all,

Today’s follow-up:

-6.4: I have approved

-6.4.1: I have approved

-6.4.3 still need fixing

-6.6.3 was submitted but empty, I have unlocked.  (Trying to get this closed out so you don’t have to file VRs anymore.)

-6.6.4 still needs fixing

Best,

Gustaaf

-6.4: looks good, please submit it.
-6.4.1: you say “we have received all VTRx+ devices at CERN.”  Is that accurate?  It seems to conflict with what’s written for 6.4.  (I think you can just remove that sentence, since it has little to do with the direct impact.)  I have unlocked this.
-6.4.3: You are only asked for a report on cost variance, so please don’t write about schedule variance.  (Didn’t need to unlock as wasn’t submitted)

-6.5.4 I have approved.  Next time, please add something in the impact statement about available float.

-6.6.3 is missing
-6.6.4: the cost variance number in the text is $11k different from the actual number.  I’ve unlocked this.

-6.8.1 and 6.8.4 I’ve approved