e-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: E-rhic-ir-l mailing list
List archive
- From: "Palmer, Robert" <palmer AT bnl.gov>
- To: Alexander Kiselev <kisselev AT mail.desy.de>
- Cc: "Berg, J Scott" <jsberg AT bnl.gov>, "E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Latest version of IR dry-run
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:30:45 +0000
Latest version of IR dry-run tomorrow
Ps I do not know what I was thinking in my last version. The use of some mix
of HL and HA parameters indeed seems the right thing to do.
The current very large y divergences in both HA and HL are probably the most
worrying things to discuss. We need more study of the Low Divergence (LD),
and very Low Divergence (VLD) cases that I had started looking at. I am not
sure how much that should be discussed in the Review. I am also not sure how
much mention I should make of the VHL (without cooling) case.
Bob
Ps I know this will have to be put into Power Point, unless we could persuade
Scott to make a Tex version that mimics PP. Do we have the PP profile that we
should be using?
Attachment:
1703-IR-talk-v3.pdf
Description: 1703-IR-talk-v3.pdf
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Latest version of IR dry-run,
Palmer, Robert, 03/14/2017
- Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Latest version of IR dry-run, Aschenauer Elke-Caroline, 03/15/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.