ePIC pfRICH mailing list

["Kiselev, Alexander" <ayk AT bnl.gov>]

  Hi Thomas,

  sure I noticed the DAC meeting open part is supposed to end at 1:30. This particular time slot was checked by everyone who participated in the poll so far, while the rest of the week days looks like a swiss cheese on the doodle poll.

  Regards,

      Alexander.

---

From: Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Thomas Ullrich via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:51 PM
To: eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] Meeting tomorrow Wednesday 2pm Eastern time

 

Hi Alexander,

please note that the DAC meeting is starting on Wednesday. The open
agenda ends at 1:30 so this is OK unless of course we run over, which is
not uncommon with R&D reviews ;-)
There's however a close DAC meeting from 1:30 to 2:30 that I might
or might not (?) need to attend. In this case I will be a tic late.

- Thomas

On 10/18/22 13:45, Kiselev, Alexander via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l wrote:
>    Dear All,
>
>    not sure the INFN colleagues who are at CERN these days will be able
> to join, yet let's have a zoom meeting at 2pm NY time tomorrow Wednesday
> October 19^th
>
> https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1619779791?pwd=TUtVak9TMjdsb05CbkVrZmh2a2JzZz09 <https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1619779791?pwd=TUtVak9TMjdsb05CbkVrZmh2a2JzZz09>
>
>    I'm going to present a set of slides on various details of the
> conceptual pfRICH design, which should hopefully trigger a discussion of
> what we want to incorporate now (in particular in order to look
> competitive to mRICH) and what can wait till next year. This discussion,
> to first order, will define the needs in geometry description and
> reconstruction software modifications.
>
>    We should also discuss what part of the ATHENA heritage in terms of
> the detector-level simulations can be recycled, and what was critically
> missing on pfRICH side in the ATHENA proposal back then.
>
>    We did not do any pfRICH-related "physics" simulations for ATHENA,
> and I think should discuss (1) do we need many at this stage, (2) if
> yes, which ones should we focus on and who can do this.
>
>    I believe cost, schedule and Co can come later, but we can discuss
> this as well, or any other topics people think have a priority.
>
>    We may be looking for a 1.5h long meeting this time.
>
>    Regards,
>      Alexander.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eic-projdet-pfrich-l mailing list
> Eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/eic-projdet-pfrich-l
_______________________________________________
Eic-projdet-pfrich-l mailing list
Eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/eic-projdet-pfrich-l