ePIC pfRICH mailing list

[Thomas Ullrich <thomas.ullrich AT bnl.gov>]

I assumed that the doodle poll was for repeating meetings not a one time 
thing. The spot is good for me, just not tomorrow as I might have to 
stay for the DAC discussions at the end.

- Thomas

On 10/18/22 13:59, Kiselev, Alexander wrote:
>    Hi Thomas,
>
>    sure I noticed the DAC meeting open part is supposed to end at 1:30. 
> This particular time slot was checked by everyone who participated in 
> the poll so far, while the rest of the week days looks like a swiss 
> cheese on the doodle poll.
>
>    Regards,
>        Alexander.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Eic-projdet-pfrich-l 
> <eic-projdet-pfrich-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Thomas Ullrich 
> via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:51 PM
> *To:* eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov 
> <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] Meeting tomorrow Wednesday 2pm 
> Eastern time
> Hi Alexander,
>
> please note that the DAC meeting is starting on Wednesday. The open
> agenda ends at 1:30 so this is OK unless of course we run over, which is
> not uncommon with R&D reviews ;-)
> There's however a close DAC meeting from 1:30 to 2:30 that I might
> or might not (?) need to attend. In this case I will be a tic late.
>
> - Thomas
>
> On 10/18/22 13:45, Kiselev, Alexander via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l wrote:
> >     Dear All,
> >
> >     not sure the INFN colleagues who are at CERN these days will be able 
> > to join, yet let's have a zoom meeting at 2pm NY time tomorrow Wednesday 
> > October 19^th
> >
> > https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1619779791?pwd=TUtVak9TMjdsb05CbkVrZmh2a2JzZz09 
> > <https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1619779791?pwd=TUtVak9TMjdsb05CbkVrZmh2a2JzZz09> 
> > <https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1619779791?pwd=TUtVak9TMjdsb05CbkVrZmh2a2JzZz09 
> > <https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1619779791?pwd=TUtVak9TMjdsb05CbkVrZmh2a2JzZz09>>
> >
> >     I'm going to present a set of slides on various details of the 
> > conceptual pfRICH design, which should hopefully trigger a discussion of 
> > what we want to incorporate now (in particular in order to look 
> > competitive to mRICH) and what can wait till next year. This discussion, 
> > to first order, will define the needs in geometry description and 
> > reconstruction software modifications.
> >
> >     We should also discuss what part of the ATHENA heritage in terms of 
> > the detector-level simulations can be recycled, and what was critically 
> > missing on pfRICH side in the ATHENA proposal back then.
> >
> >     We did not do any pfRICH-related "physics" simulations for ATHENA, 
> > and I think should discuss (1) do we need many at this stage, (2) if 
> > yes, which ones should we focus on and who can do this.
> >
> >     I believe cost, schedule and Co can come later, but we can discuss 
> > this as well, or any other topics people think have a priority.
> >
> >     We may be looking for a 1.5h long meeting this time.
> >
> >     Regards,
> >       Alexander.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eic-projdet-pfrich-l mailing list
> > Eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/eic-projdet-pfrich-l 
> <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/eic-projdet-pfrich-l>
> _______________________________________________
> Eic-projdet-pfrich-l mailing list
> Eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/eic-projdet-pfrich-l 
> <https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/eic-projdet-pfrich-l>