ePIC pfRICH mailing list

[Thomas Ullrich <thomas.ullrich AT bnl.gov>]

Hi Kong,

the plot is I think from the CDR but it was already there in the R&D 
Handbook edited by Alexander and myself.

These are to my understanding PYTHIA6 events done by Elke.


- Thomas

On 11/10/22 10:17, Tu, Zhoudunming wrote:
> Hi Thomas, all,
>
> This is a nice plot, and 7 GeV/c was also my conclusion last week. I 
> assume you generated these plots from PYTHIA 8, as I don’t see this in YR.
>
> The first plot I would produce is the Fig. 3.4 in ATHENA proposal on the 
> pi/e ratio, after some kind of scattered electron identification.
>
> A little bit update for everyone. Unfortunately the official October 
> campaign, only eicrecon was used for DIS events, which are basically not 
> usable for our purposes. Efficiency is 0.4% and the bug was about to be 
> fixed. Today at 2pm in our Simqa meeting, I’ll bring this up and we 
> might need to run Juggler again.
>
> So my plan is to focus on DIS first, then more complicated events.
>
> Kong
>
> *From: *Eic-projdet-pfrich-l 
> <eic-projdet-pfrich-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Thomas Ullrich 
> via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> *Date: *Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 5:29 PM
> *To: *eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov 
> <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> *Subject: *[Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] on the upper p limit
>
> Hi All,
>
> from the YR:
> Table 8.20 in Summary of Requirements says clearly 7 GeV/c
>
> Table 8.2 from SIDIS says 7 GeV/c
>
>
> Table 3.1 in Exec Summary says 10 GeV/c
>
> If you look at the attached plot you see that 7 GeV/c is truely getting
> most of it. Interestingly this is where h/e ~ 1.
>
> - Thomas

Attachment: PID-p-eta.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document