NPPS Leadership Team

[Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com>]

Hi Alexander,

Yes, the language has already been softened from painting EIC as a large scale computing challenge, but with the white paper also including HL-LHC I think the present content is fair. 'Fabric' is in the call and is typical ASCR lingo. 'and so on' removed. Thanks

  Torre

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 10:51 AM Alexander Kiselev <kisselev AT mail.desy.de> wrote:

   Torre,

   looks good to me, except for:

   the text indicates that the data throughput at HL-LHC and EIC are
comparable, which is hard to believe based on our current estimates.

   I'm not a native speaker, perhaps that's why the word 'fabric' does
not sound well for me, especially in a scientific context. But if you
absolutely want to use it in the title, can a couple of excessive
instances in the text be eliminated?

   Also the 'and so on' can be safely removed from the third paragraph.

   Regards,
     Alexander.



On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l wrote:

> After mods and shortening, will submit it today with the listed keywords. Final comments on text and keywords welcome.
>  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fsipzVHFaD7AbowImjsMCisY_3wRsnh4pAdG4zrQUlw/edit#
>   Torre
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:32 PM Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
>       Hi all,
>
>       In answer to this call mentioned in last week’s NPPS meeting
>
>        o
>
>           https://lotf2020.hotcrp.com 
>
>       Kolja and I were asked to put together an EIC 1-pager and I was asked for an HL-LHC 1-pager. I don’t have the imagination to create separate 1-pagers for the two so they are one and the
>       same
>
>       https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fsipzVHFaD7AbowImjsMCisY_3wRsnh4pAdG4zrQUlw/edit?usp=sharing
>
>       Comments appreciated.
>
>         Torre
>
>
>
>