NPPS Leadership Team

[Paul James Laycock <paul.james.laycock AT cern.ch>]

I think this reads very well.  One niggle, a PDF is not an observable.  Maybe "theoretically derived quantities like PDFs”?  You want to make the connection between experimental measurements and the objects in any theory which can be derived/extracted/inferred/interpreted
 etc. from those measurements.

Paul

P.S.  at least the site isn’t holycrp.com

On Mar 5, 2020, at 10:57, Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Alexander,

Yes, the language has already been softened from painting EIC as a large scale computing challenge, but with the white paper also including HL-LHC I think the present content is fair. 'Fabric' is in the call and is typical ASCR lingo. 'and so on' removed. Thanks

  Torre

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 10:51 AM Alexander Kiselev <kisselev AT mail.desy.de> wrote:

   Torre,

   looks good to me, except for:

   the text indicates that the data throughput at HL-LHC and EIC are
comparable, which is hard to believe based on our current estimates.

   I'm not a native speaker, perhaps that's why the word 'fabric' does
not sound well for me, especially in a scientific context. But if you
absolutely want to use it in the title, can a couple of excessive 
instances in the text be eliminated?

   Also the 'and so on' can be safely removed from the third paragraph.

   Regards,
     Alexander.



On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l wrote:

> After mods and shortening, will submit it today with the listed keywords. Final comments on text and keywords welcome.
>  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fsipzVHFaD7AbowImjsMCisY_3wRsnh4pAdG4zrQUlw/edit#
>   Torre
> 
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:32 PM Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
>       Hi all,
>
>       In answer to this call mentioned in last week’s NPPS meeting
>
>        o 
>
>           https://lotf2020.hotcrp.com 
>
>       Kolja and I were asked to put together an EIC 1-pager and I was asked for an HL-LHC 1-pager. I don’t have the imagination to create separate 1-pagers for the two so they are one and the
>       same
>
>       https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fsipzVHFaD7AbowImjsMCisY_3wRsnh4pAdG4zrQUlw/edit?usp=sharing
>
>       Comments appreciated.
>
>         Torre
> 
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l