Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

phys-npps-mgmt-l - Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Proposal for common EIC sims effort

phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: NPPS Leadership Team

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: pinkenburg <pinkenburg AT bnl.gov>
  • To: phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Proposal for common EIC sims effort
  • Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:37:22 -0500

Hi Torre,

in general getting Makoto involved is a good idea but one has to realize that his strength is G4, likely not frameworks. So this proposal is a thinly veiled attempt of JLab to acquire the software leadership (which given the support we get from BNL seems to be a foregone conclusion).

In general it reads like the JLab software talks I have seen - no real meat only smoke and mirrors. They throw the kitchen sink with a mixture of solutions (use G4 Regions - which doesn't really work here if you think about it) and a random wish list (cutting edge IT technologies), buzz words ("plug in", PTL, TBB - isn't TBB discontinued?).

But the main problem is that the workplan is completely off. 4 months at 50% to deliver a framework (from scratch), create a pluggable sim framework, create an EIC  physics list (which is a real beast, given the energy range of the EIC and variety of detector technologies - I would not be surprised if it is more complex than the LHC), create sims for SoLID (this is a funny one - we offered them Fun4All but they declined, 4 years later they obviously still don't have anything working) and integrate with the software effort (4 months = 16 weekly meetings).

Given that timescale - the outcome will be whatever JLab has is the solution.

I think it would be great if Makoto would get the G4 sims ready for the EIC, I don't see anyone else who is available and could do this for the EIC (and detectors are being designed NOW). This needs at least a semi-realistic goal setting to make it fly.

Chris
 




On 2/17/2021 9:54 AM, Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l wrote:
The red part is a recent addition to strengthen the case for JLab support.
Please don't circulate it further.
  Torre

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:50 AM Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I attach the still-draft proposal to engage Makoto Asai in leading a common EIC simu effort that I've mentioned a few times. JLab is supportive and seems likely to try to turn it into a contract. Ideally (from my point of view) BNL will get involved also, e.g. by extending its duration. I'm not raising that sort of suggestion until JLab's intentions become clearer, and I'm interested to hear your comments. It's still a draft as I say.
  Torre

--
-- Torre Wenaus, BNL NPPS Group, ATLAS Experiment
-- BNL 510A 1-222 | 631-681-7892 |  wenaus AT gmail.com | npps.bnl.gov | wenaus.com
-- NPPS Mattermost room: https://chat.sdcc.bnl.gov/npps/channels/town-square


--
-- Torre Wenaus, BNL NPPS Group, ATLAS Experiment
-- BNL 510A 1-222 | 631-681-7892 |  wenaus AT gmail.com | npps.bnl.gov | wenaus.com
-- NPPS Mattermost room: https://chat.sdcc.bnl.gov/npps/channels/town-square

_______________________________________________
Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l

-- 
*************************************************************

Christopher H. Pinkenburg	;    pinkenburg AT bnl.gov
				;    http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/~pinkenbu

Brookhaven National Laboratory	;    phone: (631) 344-5692
Physics Department Bldg 510 C	;    fax:   (631) 344-3253
Upton, NY 11973-5000

*************************************************************



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page