sPHENIX cold QCD topical group

[Itaru Nakagawa <itaru AT riken.jp>]

Hi Dennis,

 Thank you for the instructions. We are making progress following the policy. Indeed local polarimetry results are quite important to be presented in the plenary sessions. We'll make sure these plots are to be approved.

Best regards,

-itaru

On 2024/06/02 15:23, Perepelitsa, Dennis wrote:

Hi Devon, Itaru, Ejiro, all,

Thanks a lot for coordinating on this! It would also be very useful to have such plots for the sPHENIX Run Report and/or sPHENIX Highlights plenary talks on Thursday [1]  

My only suggestion is to make sure we follow the recently-updated Public Plots policy [2]. The candidate plots + supporting material are supposed to be circulated and discussed in the relevant TG/Calibration/Subsystem group first, and then they get circulated to sphenix-l for three BNL working days before sPHENIX approves them.

By the way, the GM this Friday (7 June) is a possible time to approve plots, but we are also planning to schedule an addition approval session next week, for example on Wednesday (12 June), for plots that need a bit more time - that is to be announced.

Dennis

[1] https://indico.bnl.gov/event/22687/ 

[2] https://sphenix-invenio.sdcc.bnl.gov/me/requests/2e06e2aa-ed26-4e4e-a581-ec1822b27c18 

On Jun 2, 2024, at 12:34 PM, Devon Loomis via sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l <sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello all,

I can also write in there as well.

Thanks,

Devon

On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 2:27 PM Itaru Nakagawa via sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l <sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Ejiro,

Thanks. Please take care of the ZDC energy calibration section of the analysis note.

I am working on the SMD section of the calorimeter calibration meeting. We'll post the draft slide to the matter most this evening.

Regards,

-itaru

On 2024/06/02 14:24, Ejiro Umaka wrote:

Great! Saves me time in writing a separate note. 

Also in addition to presenting the ZDC energy distribution at the calo calibration meeting on my behalf, you may also want to include the SMD x,y profiles. It’s not clear where the boundaries are in terms of what topical group to present ZDC/SMD results destined for approvals.

I’ll discuss offline on the final format the SMD x,y profiles should be,  in readiness for approvals. 

Best,

Ejiro 

On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 13:55 Itaru Nakagawa <itaru AT riken.jp> wrote:

Hi Ejiro,

 Thanks for the advise. I think we better also squeeze in ZDC energy calibration as well into the approval session. It is also good proof of consistency with the past measurements in PHENIX era (as attached). How do you think?

 I'll try to setup write permission to others.

-itaru

On 2024/06/02 13:38, Ejiro Umaka wrote:

I submitted a talk request on the ZDC/SMD commissioning in p+p and initial results.

Since I was invited to give a talk on bulk physics at the same conference, I’ll withdraw the ZDC/SMD talk request.

I think you should allow write access to the overleaf document and include every one who contributed to making the ZDC/SMD and local polarimetry commissioning successful to this point. 

Best,

Ejiro 

On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 13:14 Itaru Nakagawa via sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l <sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear cold-QCD group,

   I haven't heard back from anyone who is interested in presenting
poster in the coming RHIC&AGS meeting. Jaein shows the interest to
present a poster for the local polarimeter. Let us know if there can be
any conflict.

  I think it is also good idea to ask Genki to cover the readiness of
the spin specific readiness including local polarimetery in his sping
talk. Towards these reports, we need to swim thru the plot approval
session in the next general meeting on Friday June 7th. Possible
candidate plots to be proceeded to the approval session are:

1. x,y profiles w/ and w/o radius cut. 2 dim and 1 dim projections with
spin up and down superimposed.

2. bunch by bunch asymmetries

3. sin(phi) modulation for blue and yellow for both fowards and backwards.

Anything else? Your advises are appreciated.

Thanks to Devon and Jaein to initiate the work, the development of
documentation already started. The deadline for the analysis note is
coming Tuesday. Sorry for such a rush, but the finite asymmetries were
first observed only 5 days ago...

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.overleaf.com/project/665bd5cb5705676605f5cb59__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!GBeZ0iOBKqSIR0HNoua6jtSEXomjgSeNgEcKmh1Jb5ER3GTOtZxLQQZp7uddvVrZcBon4KTPiJbKXiKTWN32cg8LpeL6S1U$

Ralf and Calo, please advise what to do with the write permission of
this document. Shall we open to everybody or limited authors.

Best regards,

-itaru



On 2024/05/31 22:51, Itaru Nakagawa via sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>  Are there anyone who would like to present a poster of cold-QCD topic
> in the coming RHIC&AGS users meeting? If multiple people show
> interest, we need to coordinate.
>
> Regards,
>
> -itaru
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l mailing list
> sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-cold-qcd-l
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l mailing list
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-cold-qcd-l

_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l mailing list
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-cold-qcd-l

_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l mailing list
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-cold-qcd-l

Dennis V. Perepelitsa
Associate Professor, Physics Department
University of Colorado Boulder