Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-emcal-l - Re: [[Sphenix-emcal-l] ] [External] Re: Plot_Approval_DNP_Talk

sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Regmi, Sijan" <sr276419 AT ohio.edu>
  • To: Blair Daniel Seidlitz <blair.daniel.seidlitz AT cern.ch>, "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [[Sphenix-emcal-l] ] [External] Re: Plot_Approval_DNP_Talk
  • Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:02:08 +0000

Thank you very much.

 

Sure, I will update as per your instructions.

 

Sijan Regmi

 

From: Blair Daniel Seidlitz <blair.daniel.seidlitz AT cern.ch>
Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 at 5:16
PM
To: sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Regmi, Sijan <sr276419 AT ohio.edu>
Subject: [External] Re: Plot_Approval_DNP_Talk

Use caution with links and attachments.

Dear Sijan,

 

Looks good and is approved.  I would move the z-axis title a little so it doesn't overlap the numeric labels.  Also, I would put "eta bin index" not "etabin index" and similarly with phi. 

 

Best,

Blair 


From: sphenix-emcal-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-emcal-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Regmi, Sijan <sr276419 AT ohio.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:29 PM
To: sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [[Sphenix-emcal-l] ] Plot_Approval_DNP_Talk

 

Good afternoon, All,

 

I would like to get approval for one plot in my DNP talk. I presented this at today’s mini calo meeting. I would like to replace one plot on slide 5 from my Monday’s presentation (plot will be on 5th slide in my DNP talk). I need approval for the plot on the right (the left one is already approved).

 

Previously, I had a plot showing ratio of “measured de-calibration” to “true de-calibration” after few iterations to indicate input de-calibration in EMCal was smoothed out in pi0 embedded HIJING. Now, I want to replace that with pi0 mass plot for all EMCal towers obtained after 9 iterations. This new plot shows de-calibration smooths out after 9 iterations after de-calibration is applied and pi0 peak value converges to 135 MeV in those regions where de-calibration is applied.

The current plot conveys same meaning as previous plot (one I had on presentation on Monday), but I believe current plot I want to have is easier to understand for audience than what I had before.

Please find the plot in the attachment and let me know is there is any question or need more information.

Regards

Sijan Regmi

 

 

 

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page