sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject:
sPHENIX discussion of the superconducting solenoid
List archive
- From: Kin Yip <kinyip AT bnl.gov>
- To: "sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Sphenix-magnet-l] low current test plan
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:54:15 -0400
Hi,
Thanks Joe ! I've put your newest version here :
https://collab.external.bnl.gov/sites/sPHENIX-Magnet/Shared%20Documents/100%20A%20Test/sPHENIX%20Solenoid%20Test%20Plan%20Summary%20Rev%20d.docx
(under https://collab.external.bnl.gov/sites/sPHENIX-Magnet/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx
=> "100 A Test" )
I'll update this note/link here when we have new versions in the
future.
Kin
On 04/22/2015 04:33 PM, Muratore,
Joseph wrote:
Hi
Kin,
The
attached run plan has been revised to include the items
discussed at today’s meeting, namely, the specific wording
for monitoring data during cooldown and warmup, and also
adding power cycle tests at the operating ramp rate of 2.5
A. As Bob has pointed out, we can use the voltage data
from the power cycles to actually calculate the delivered
power, which may be of interest.
Joe
From:
sphenix-magnet-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
[mailto:sphenix-magnet-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov]
On Behalf Of Kin Yip
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 3:10 PM
To: sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Brief summary of
the biweekly meeting on Apr. 22, 2015
Hi,
In today's meeting, we first went through the draft plan for
the low current (100 A) test for the sPHENIX magnet in Bldg.
912.
We've realized that before we could do this test, we would
need to make all the connections and test that they work.
Roberto Than's
cryogenic group and Paul Giannotti are keen sorting this
out. Piyush Josh's data acquisition system would read out
from
various inputs/sensors. The inter-connections and
inter-relationship between various components, and what need
to be read out or
not, will need to be sorted out by different parties. Bob
Lambiase entertained us with the idea of using different
ramp rate to see
whether the magnet would quench or not etc. It's said that
the magnet may unevitably quench a few times during the test
so that we
would have a few cycles of experiences "naturally".
In the next meeting, Roberto may show us all the connections
that are involved ... and we may then understand better and
divide up
the responsibilities.
There is also interest to measure the magnetic during the
100 A test. Achim Franz will be responsible for this and
we'll sort out
how the field measurements will be read out.
There was no objection to schedule a PCSS (Pressure &
Cryogenic Safety Subcommittee) review in mid-May. I've just
begun
communicating with the secretary to schedule a review. It
seems that Roberto is responsible for discussing about the
pressure and cryogenic part and M. Anerella is responsible
for discussing about the mechanical design of this magnet. (
I'm
confirming with Mike for the latter part. )
Jim Mills told us that the test schedules for the
low-current version and high-current version will be sent
out soon. Then, various parties
will need to fill in the "cost" to estimate our total cost.
It's believed that the high-current test will cost much more
than the low-current one.
Roberto's cryogenic group and the people in SMD have done
some works around the junction box/valve box ... which are
parts of all the works needed to
make the whole thing work.
Kin
|
-
[Sphenix-magnet-l] low current test plan,
Kin Yip, 04/22/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.