Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-maps-l - Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force

sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX MAPS tracker discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Sanghoon Lim <shlim AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: mxliu <ming AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: Molly Taylor <mitay AT umich.edu>, Carlos Perez <carlos.perezlara AT stonybrook.edu>, Mickey Chiu <chiu AT bnl.gov>, "sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Chiu, Mickey" <chiu AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, sphenix-maps-l <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Todoroki, Takahito" <todoroki AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force
  • Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:28:07 -0600

Hi Ming,

Requiring at least 2 associated MVTX hits already provide a huge rejection of fake tracks (tracks from pileup events). Therefore the DCA shapes are looks quite similar, as you can see in the full DCA distribution of low pT tracks (black-w/o pileup, red-w/ pileup). One thing to point is that there's still a long tail in simulation w/o pileup.

https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/p/draft/shlim/plots/20180823/sPHENIX_sim_pileup_pp_dca_xy_2bins.gif
https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/p/draft/shlim/plots/20180823/sPHENIX_sim_pileup_pp_dca_z_2bins.gif

Things may change with using realistic seed vertex instead of using true vertex, and this study will be followed when the module is ready.

Best,
Sanghoon  


On Aug 23, 2018, at 3:23 PM, mxliu <ming AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Sanghoon,
 
Very nice work!  Is it possible to evaluate fake track rate for large DCA ghost tracks? 
 
Cheers,
Ming 
-- 
Ming Xiong Liu
P-25, MS H846                     TEL:505-667-7125 
Physics Division                             631-344-7821(BNL)
LANL                                               630-840-5708(FNAL)
Los Alamos, NM 87545      FAX:        505-665-7020
 
 
From: sPHENIX-MAPS-l <sphenix-maps-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Sanghoon Lim <shlim AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Date: Thursday, August 23, 2018 at 2:18 PM
To: Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>
Cc: Molly Taylor <mitay AT umich.edu>, Carlos Perez <carlos.perezlara AT stonybrook.edu>, <sanghoon.lim AT colorado.edu>, Mickey Chiu <chiu AT bnl.gov>, "sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Chiu, Mickey" <chiu AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, sPHENIX-MVTX <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Todoroki, Takahito" <todoroki AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force
 
Hi all,
 
I produced a new set of files based on comments from the task force meeting, and you can check with the link below (added in the indico).
 
 
I can probably have a quick look on the performance of 2 layers of INTT with the hit files I have right now for the next week.
 
Best,
Sanghoon


On Aug 21, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch> wrote:
 

Hi Everybody, 

we will have the next meeting of the inner tracker task force, tomorrow, Wednesday, at 9am EST.
The indico link can be found here:
https://indico.bnl.gov/event/4885/

The google doc can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17PJdu94Ydg25V-cTHIYfSbkfojH4ZUEfsfoZPm0RDb0/edit

Please update the doc by Wednesday to reflect our current status. 

Cheers

  Christof 

 
_______________________________________________ sPHENIX-MAPS-l mailing list sPHENIX-MAPS-l AT lists.bnl.govhttps://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-maps-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page