Commissioning and running of sPHENIX

[Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>]

Hello Stefan,

This seems like a very important question that we should make sure to get right.

What is at stake here? Do we have guidance from CAD on crossing angle vs maximum luminosity?

Thanks

Tony

---

From: Sphenix-run-l <sphenix-run-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Alexander Bazilevsky <shura AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 10:21 AM
To: sphenix-run-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-run-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-run-l] Fwd: [request for input] sPHENIX crossing angle with PP in Run24

 

Hi Stefan,

Ralf has calculations of the expected impact of the cross angle on polarization. I haven't seen any calculations like that from STAR people. So, they are talking qualitatively (yes, the effect may be there), but we are talking quantitatively (the effect is small).
I think Ralf may give more details and/or correct my understanding.

Sasha.

On 9/18/23 10:09 AM, Stefan Bathe wrote:

Hi All,

Please see Kiel’s message below.  I don’t feel qualified to answer this by myself.  So I’m asking for input.  But I’d like to turn this around within 24 h.

I think the answer to the question why we are not concerned about running polarized protons with a crossing angle is quantitative:  in principle it’s a concern, but quantitatively we think we can live with it. But I don’t know what the actual evidence is.

I think there’s no reasonable chance we’d switch to a zero crossing angle except in a disaster scenario (luminosity so low that we don’t need a crossing angle; or no tracking).

Best,

Stefan

- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Bathe

Professor of Physics
Baruch College, CUNY
and RIKEN Visiting Scientist

Baruch:                                     BNL:
17 Lexington Ave                      Bldg. 510
office 940                                  office 2-229
phone 646-660-6272                phone 631-344-8490
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Hock, Kiel" <khock AT bnl.gov>

Subject: sPHENIX crossing angle with PP in Run24

Date: September 18, 2023 at 09:20:48 EDT

To: "stefan.bathe AT baruch.cuny.edu" <stefan.bathe AT baruch.cuny.edu>, "Bathe, Stefan" <bathe AT bnl.gov>

Cc: "Fischer, Wolfram" <wfischer AT bnl.gov>, "Minty, Michiko" <minty AT bnl.gov>, "Schoefer, Vincent" <schoefer AT bnl.gov>, "Gu, Xiaofeng" <xgu AT bnl.gov>

* This email originates from a sender outside of CUNY. Verify the sender before replying or clicking on links and attachments. *

Hi Stefan,

To support intensities at RHIC above 2.1e11 protons/bunch, a crossing angle at sPHENIX is needed. 

Is there a reason why sPHENIX is not concerned about having a crossing angle for polarized protons where STAR is?

Is there a possibility that sPHENIX will change to a zero crossing angle during the run, which would limit the maximum intensity?

Thank you,

Kiel

_______________________________________________
Sphenix-run-l mailing list
Sphenix-run-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-run-l

-- 
Alexander Bazilevsky
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Bldg. 510D, 2-232
Upton, NY 11973 Tel: 631-344-3712
Email: shura AT bnl.gov
-------------------------------------------------