sPHENIX tracking discussion

[Thomas K Hemmick <hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu>]

Hi Tony

Fortunately for me, the stuff I did that was lost seems to be well localized:

1)  Various typo/wording things (we'll pass over those again regardless).

2)  Eliminating empty columns from the TPC schedule tables (the one that clued me in).

3)  Discussion on some MAPS R&D (~2 paragraphs).

4)  Discussion of TPC Manpower (~1 short paragraph).

Go ahead with the major re-arrangement and give us a head's up when this is done.  It won't take me long to restore what I lost since it is minimal.  I can't say what other people might have lost, so they will have to look.

Overleaf *does* have a version tagging system.  Unfortunately we only used it 4 days ago and 23 days ago.  I did look at the 4-days-ago tagged versions (made by John Haggerty) and these seem to be tags made after my losses.  23 days ago is too old to be relevant.

Tom

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu> wrote:

Damn. This is almost certainly due to the problem we finally deduced with the GitHub bridge, where it does not do the pulls correctly so does not synchronize with your local version, but it does the pushes diligently - so that it overwrites previous changes that were not conveyed to the local area by the pull.

Sorry, but this was probably done by me when I was still operating under the assumption that this all worked as advertised.

Can anyone say if there is some kind of tracking of changes available in Overleaf? If not, Tom do you have a copy (pdf would do) that includes the changes?

When I reorganize it I will take the edit token and do a fresh clone, edit it and push the edits, then release the edit token.

Thanks
Tony
 

---

From: tkhemmick AT gmail.com [tkhemmick AT gmail.com] on behalf of Thomas K Hemmick [hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 10:13 AM
To: Frawley, Anthony
Cc: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Reorganizing the tracking section of the pCDR

BTW--All the new sections I added in response to questions from our reviewers are also missing.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Thomas K Hemmick <hemmick AT skipper.physics.sunysb.edu> wrote:

Hi guys

I'm working on costs and found something weird.  Among the very last edits on the sections that I did was to eliminate from my schedule tables a few "empty" columns for descriptions.  All these empty columns are back.  Did someone overwrite the overleaf version with something from earlier?  It will truly be a pain for every one of us to have to hunt down what changes we made that were lost.

Tom

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Frawley, Anthony <afrawley AT fsu.edu> wrote:

Hi All,

We need to get started on reorganizing the tracking section of the pCDR.

Was anyone else planning to do this? I would be willing to work on it, if no one wants to wrestle me for it.

Cheers
Tony

_______________________________________________
Sphenix-tracking-l mailing list
Sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l