STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Helen Caines <helen.caines AT yale.edu>]

Agreed, as per our usual STAR policies, since the new and old results are not 
consistent we will stop showing our preliminary results and not show anything 
new until the results are published. The PAs are strongly encouraged to focus 
on publishing these new results above any other analyses they are doing so we 
dont mislead the community any longer than necessary to ensure we publish 
correct results.

Helen

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 24, 2022, at 8:56 PM, Rongrong Ma <marr AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Hello Ho-San
> 
> Thanks for preparing the comparison plot to facilitate the discussion. 
> 
> As one can see, the preliminary and new results are not consistent and they 
> show very different trends. I do not think we should show the 
> multiplicity-dependent preliminary results any more, not just in your talk 
> but in all talks. Let's work to get the new results published as soon as 
> possible. 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> 
> Best
> Rongrong
> 
>> On Mar 24, 2022, at 8:14 PM, Ho San Ko <h-s.ko AT lbl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> As suggested during pre-QM, I prepared the p+p cumulant ratios comparison.
>> Please let me know your opinions, questions, or suggestions.
>> 
>> Thank you very much.
>> My best regards,
>> Ho-San
>> <p+p_2021_vs_2022.pdf>
>