Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
  • To: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new
  • Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:52:31 +0900

Dear Roy
The older one has been shown in CPOD2021 as preliminary and published in the
proceedings.
Best regards, ShinIchi

PS : Dear Ho-San, I did like your argument, but others were not convinced,
right?

> On Mar 25, 2022, at 11:43, Roy Lacey via Star-cf-l
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> A quick question!
> Is this a new preliminary request? Are the old results
> published in any conference proceedings?
> Thanks
> Roy
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 9:41 PM Helen Caines via Star-cf-l
> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> Agreed, as per our usual STAR policies, since the new and old results are
> not consistent we will stop showing our preliminary results and not show
> anything new until the results are published. The PAs are strongly
> encouraged to focus on publishing these new results above any other
> analyses they are doing so we dont mislead the community any longer than
> necessary to ensure we publish correct results.
>
> Helen
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Mar 24, 2022, at 8:56 PM, Rongrong Ma <marr AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Ho-San
> >
> > Thanks for preparing the comparison plot to facilitate the discussion.
> >
> > As one can see, the preliminary and new results are not consistent and
> > they show very different trends. I do not think we should show the
> > multiplicity-dependent preliminary results any more, not just in your
> > talk but in all talks. Let's work to get the new results published as
> > soon as possible.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Best
> > Rongrong
> >
> >> On Mar 24, 2022, at 8:14 PM, Ho San Ko <h-s.ko AT lbl.gov> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> As suggested during pre-QM, I prepared the p+p cumulant ratios
> >> comparison.
> >> Please let me know your opinions, questions, or suggestions.
> >>
> >> Thank you very much.
> >> My best regards,
> >> Ho-San
> >> <p+p_2021_vs_2022.pdf>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page