star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new
- From: Ho San Ko <h-s.ko AT lbl.gov>
- To: Roy Lacey <roy.lacey AT stonybrook.edu>, STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT icloud.com>, Xiaofeng Luo <xfluo AT mail.ccnu.edu.cn>, "Ruan, Lijuan" <ruan AT bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:56:35 -0700
Hi Roy,
This is not a new preliminary request.
And yes, they were published in CPOD2021 conference proceedings.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Ho-San
On Mar 24, 2022, at 19:43, Roy Lacey via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:A quick question!Is this a new preliminary request? Are the old results published in any conference proceedings?ThanksRoy_______________________________________________On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 9:41 PM Helen Caines via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:Agreed, as per our usual STAR policies, since the new and old results are not consistent we will stop showing our preliminary results and not show anything new until the results are published. The PAs are strongly encouraged to focus on publishing these new results above any other analyses they are doing so we dont mislead the community any longer than necessary to ensure we publish correct results.
Helen
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 8:56 PM, Rongrong Ma <marr AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hello Ho-San
>
> Thanks for preparing the comparison plot to facilitate the discussion.
>
> As one can see, the preliminary and new results are not consistent and they show very different trends. I do not think we should show the multiplicity-dependent preliminary results any more, not just in your talk but in all talks. Let's work to get the new results published as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Best
> Rongrong
>
>> On Mar 24, 2022, at 8:14 PM, Ho San Ko <h-s.ko AT lbl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As suggested during pre-QM, I prepared the p+p cumulant ratios comparison.
>> Please let me know your opinions, questions, or suggestions.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>> My best regards,
>> Ho-San
>> <p+p_2021_vs_2022.pdf>
>
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
-
[Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Ho San Ko, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Rongrong Ma, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Helen Caines, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Roy Lacey, 03/24/2022
- Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new, ShinIchi Esumi, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Ho San Ko, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Roy Lacey, 03/24/2022
- Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new, Ho San Ko, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Roy Lacey, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Roy Lacey, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Helen Caines, 03/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] p+p net-proton cumulant ratios old vs new,
Rongrong Ma, 03/24/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.