STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Rutik Manikandhan <manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com>]

Hello All,

Here's the final version of the Poster. We decided not to include the THERMAL Fist predictions.

Thank you for all the valuable comments, please let me know if there are any more.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Mean-pT-fluctuations-3GeV-fixed-target-collisions-STAR-experiment

Best,

Rutik Manikandhan

PhD Candidate, Experimental High Energy Group

Physics Dept.

University of Houston

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 5:54 PM Rutik Manikandhan <manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hello All,

I have made all the changes you have asked for. 

I shall add the theory curve soon and reupload it by Wednesday.

Here's the new version uploaded : https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Mean-pT-fluctuations-3GeV-fixed-target-collisions-STAR-experiment

Best,

Rutik Manikandhan

PhD Candidate, Experimental High Energy Group

Physics Dept.

University of Houston

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 12:02 AM EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:

Dear Rutik
Thank you very much for the nice poster, as I was asked by Sooraj to review
your poster for the QM in order to help our very busy conveners, so I’m sending
you some comments on your nice poster mostly for the minor things.

* You have two sets of data for eta=[-1,0] at mid-rapidity and for [-2,0] including
  forward region. You have chosen to show your final results at "6. Results - II",
  with blue for the mid-rapidity and red for including forward region, where I
  would suggest reversing the color, since higher energy points are mostly at
  mid-rapidity, right? You plot the corrected point left from the uncorrected one
  for the red, but it is plotted on the right for the blue, so I would like to have
  them plotted consistently by shifting always towards one side. I would also
  shift the forward point to the left (lower energy) with respect to the mid-rapidity
  point. Please make all the points larger and make them clearly visible. Please
  plot differently for the model compared to the data. Is the correction applied
  only for your data at 3GeV? What about higher energy points?

* Concerning on the unfolding, I would still like to discuss with you why you
  could have safely unfolded the mean pT in 1D, where I was expecting that
  we would need 2D-unfolding in (charged multiplicity, mean pT) space, that
  we can talk face-to-face during the actual QM-poster session and/or pre-QM,
  see you soon.

That’s all from my side. Thanks again for your nice poster.
Best regards, ShinIchi

> 2023/08/26 0:28、webmaster--- via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:
>
> Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Rutik Manikandhan (manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for 
> a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64884
>
> Deadline: 2023-09-03
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-cf-l mailing list
> Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l