STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>]

Hi Ke and All,

Thank you for the updated abstract which is fine to me.
I sign off.

Best regards,
Nu

> On Aug 13, 2024, at 6:11 PM, K.Mi <mike1996 AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn> wrote:
> 
> Dear Nu,
> 
> Thank you for the nice comments. I’ve modified the abstract, the updated 
> version can be found via:
> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/WPCF-2024/Recent-Results-Baryon-Correlations-RHIC-STAR-1
> 
>> 3) At the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, add something like: “During the 
>> 2nd phase RHIC beam energy scan,  in addition to its collider program,  a 
>> systematic measurements on collision energy dependence, with the 
>> fixed-target program, has been made by the STAR experiment.”;
> 
> -> I plan to focus on 3GeV FXT and Isobar results in this talk, and will 
> not discuss the collision energy dependence. So we would like to keep the 
> current version.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> Best regards,
> Ke
> 
>> 2024年8月12日 22:24，Nu Xu <NXu AT lbl.gov> 写道：
>> 
>> Hi Ke and All,
>> 
>> I guess that I over looked the abstract. If fact, I do not know where to 
>> see these kind of messages.
>> In any case, here are my suggestions on the abstract:
>> 
>> 1) line 12: Based on the natural of interactions, I would suggest we group 
>> the correlation functions into two: (i) Without strangeness: pp, pd, dd; 
>> and (ii) With strangeness: pL, pXi-, dL;
>> 
>> 2) line 13: remove ‘and others’ as such statement is wired in any 
>> abstract. Or if you know exactly what you mean in ‘others’, simply spell 
>> them out;
>> 
>> 3) At the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, add something like: “During the 
>> 2nd phase RHIC beam energy scan,  in addition to its collider program,  a 
>> systematic measurements on collision energy dependence, with the 
>> fixed-target program, has been made by the STAR experiment.”;
>> 
>> 4) At the end of the abstract, add: “ Extracted source size parameters, 
>> driven by collision dynamics, and the FSI parameters, determined by the 
>> natural of the pair of the particles understudy,  will be discussed within 
>> the frame work of lattice calculations (interaction potentials) and 
>> hadronic transport model calculations.” or something like this. This is 
>> necessary as it echos the physics outlined in the first paragraph of the 
>> abstract. 
>> 
>> Hope these are helpful.
>> 
>> Nu
>> 
>>> On Aug 12, 2024, at 5:55 AM, K.Mi (via star-cf-l Mailing List) 
>>> <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear conveners,
>>> 
>>> I submitted an abstract for the WPCF2024 workshop, but seems like the 
>>> ‘webmater AT star.bnl.gov” didn’t have a response. This is an invited talk 
>>> about ‘Baryon correlation at STAR'. Please kindly review the abstract 
>>> under the below link: 
>>> 
>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/WPCF-2024/Recent-Results-Baryon-Correlations-RHIC-STAR-1
>>> 
>>> Any comments or suggestions are welcome. 
>>> 
>>> Thank you. 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ke
>> 
>> 
>> 
>