Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-dilepton-l - Re: [Star-dilepton-l] NA60 IMR temperature

star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Star-dilepton-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Xu, Zhangbu" <xzb AT bnl.gov>
  • To: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>, "zy35 AT rice.edu" <zy35 AT rice.edu>
  • Cc: "Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Brandenburg, Daniel" <brandenburg.89 AT osu.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-dilepton-l] NA60 IMR temperature
  • Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:26:49 +0000

Hi, Rongrong 

I actually disagree. 
We fit their data and get the number. 
NA60 has never published an official number in a peer reviewed paper. 
We should not use any unpublished number which we cannot valify 

From: Star-dilepton-l <star-dilepton-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Ma, Rongrong <marr AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 12:05:25 PM
To: zy35 AT rice.edu <zy35 AT rice.edu>
Cc: Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Brandenburg, Daniel <brandenburg.89 AT osu.edu>
Subject: [Star-dilepton-l] NA60 IMR temperature
 
Hello Zaochen, All

I talked with Gianluca Usai from NA60 today, and he showed me that the temperature from fitting IMR of 1.2-2.5 GeV/c is 230 +/- 10 MeV, which should be treated as the official number from NA60. Could you update the T vs. muB figure that you sent to me, as well as those on your preliminary figure page? We need to make sure this number if shown from now on to avoid any further complains. My talk is on Friday, so I would appreciate if you can update the figure at your earliest convenience. Thanks. 

Best
Rongrong

On Mar 28, 2023, at 12:02 PM, Zaochen Ye <zy35 AT rice.edu> wrote:

Dear Tetyana,

Please find the overleaf link of the paper in your email, and let me know if you can see it or not.

Best,
Zaochen

On Mar 28, 2023, at 10:15 AM, Galatyuk, Tetyana Prof. Dr. <T.Galatyuk AT gsi.de> wrote:

Dear Daniel, All,
 
also today i am blocked with HP2023.
What would be important you discuss in the meeting today and actually we had this discussion in the past already (sorry that I couldn't follow our dilepton meetings):
 
  • The way T extracted for NA60 is not clear. NA60 collaborators asked to use their published values.
  • It is still no too clear that Drell-Yan was subtracted from spectra
  • It is a big concern on how charm was treated
 
The biggest concern from my side is the way we fit the spectra. In fact we can use the fit and extract T only if spectral function/M^2 is constant (structureless), because only than dN/dM is defined by f^B.
 
I would be happy to read new drafts of papers (please send me pdf if possible as my account was blocked… and it takes longer this time to rehabilitate…) or look at the slides or answer questions. 
 
Cheers,
Tetyana
 
 
From: Star-dilepton-l <star-dilepton-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of "Brandenburg, Daniel" <brandenburg.89 AT osu.edu>
Date: Tuesday, 28. March 2023 at 14:36
To: "Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Star-dilepton-l] Dilepton meeting reminder
 
Dear all,
 
This is a reminder for our dilepton meeting today at 10am. Yiding will give a presentation. Please let us know if anyone else would like to share slides. 
 
Drupal: 
 
 
Zoom:
 
 
Best,
 
Daniel Brandenburg
Assistant Professor 
College of Arts and Sciences 
Department of Physics 
Ohio State University 
_______________________________________________
Star-dilepton-l mailing list
Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-dilepton-l__;!!BuQPrrmRaQ!mE7XxTnb7U_Qi0CaruUMZiGLbRS82QX8aN3K49rv2M6dT2PiRyIhZQW_P58QQoG8WwyLOik9W5cFNwjEul0wm_glFxV-ZA$ 

_______________________________________________
Star-dilepton-l mailing list
Star-dilepton-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-dilepton-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page