Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for DAE HEP 2020 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for DAE HEP 2020 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:28:16 -0400

Hello Prabhupada,

The abstract is already in a good shape, please consider the following comments.

Comments on the abstract:

cross section for φ mesons are —> cross section for φ mesons is

φ mesons hadrons allows — > φ mesons allows

collective properties of early stages —> collective properties of the early stages

at a new centre-of-mass energies —> at the new centre-of-mass energies

Event Plane Detector (EPD) allows —> Event Plane Detectors (EPDs) allow

using event plane with large gaps —> using event planes with large gaps

and EPD (2.1<|η|<5.1) —> and EPDs (2.1<|η|<5.1)

High precision test —> A high precision test

constituent quark scaling of v2 (including other hadrons) —> constituent quark scaling of φ meson v2 (by including measurements for other hadrons)

such measurements at the other —> such measurements at the other collision energies

of beam energy scan phase II —> of the RHIC beam energy scan phase II


Comments on the analysis & preliminary approval:

I was looking at you studies:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/BullCorr_180820.pdf
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Bulkcorr_meeting2.pdf

1. In the abstract you mentioned “of 54.4 GeV (∼1.3 billion events) and 27 GeV (∼600 million events)”
but I see you only found 600 M for 54.4 and 350M for 27 GeV. Is this difference caused by some quality cuts or you are on your way to accumulate more events?

2. Did you consider the effect of pile-up and bad runs. If not, do you plan to include such in the future analysis?

3. I think the Nhits/hitmax > 0.52 cut can be removed to gain more statistics for this precision analysis.

4. For 27 GeV analysis, a while ago Risa presented Ψ2 event plane resolution for her study, can you please cross-check if your resolution numbers are consistent (at least in the same ballpark) with what she got:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Risa_pwg0318_ver2.pdf

Regards,
Prithwish


On 2020-09-14 22:44, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Prabhupada Dixit (prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in) has submitted a material for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52051

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page