STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Niseem,
  The abstract looks good, please consider the following comments in the 
next version.

Comments on the abstract :

using the STAR experiment —> from the STAR experiment

 Au+At at 200 —> Au+Au at 200

“The measurements scaling features”   sounds a bit ambiguous, pls. be 
specific and revise this sentence.

constraints for—> constraints on

upcoming O+O and p+Au runs at RHIC  —> anticipated O+O run at RHIC in 
the year 2021

Do you want to mention p+Au here ? A p+Au run at STAR/RHIC is going to 
take a while, also we already have p+Au data which might create a 
confusion.

Along the line of ShinIchi's comments: adding a line on the novel 
subtraction method that you use can strengthen your abstract, however, I 
leave this to you.

Comments on analysis and preliminary approval :

1. We find out what would be our policy on promising isobar data in an 
abstract. If PAC’s recommendation on not showing isobar data at any 
conference was specific to CME analysis, this won’t be a problem. But, 
you don't have to worry -- we will clarify this from management before 
the abstract is submitted.

2. In your last presentation you mentioned about ongoing 27 GeV analysis 
:
https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/niseem/pwg_2020/High_PT_3.pdf
However, in this abstract you mentioned about 54 GeV. Do you have plans 
to show/include both 27 and 54 GeV ?

Best,
Prithwish


On 2020-09-14 21:27, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman (niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com) has 
> submitted a
> material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52038
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l