STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>]

Dear Niseem
I would sign off your nice abstract with the following comments. 
I would remove the “first” on the 4th line. The “scaling” property 
would need to be clearly explained and discussed in the PWG. 
Best regards, ShinIchi

> On Sep 22, 2020, at 17:21, niseem via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jiangyong,
> 
> Please find the updated abstract at this link,
> 
> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Niseem_IS1_21_0.pdf
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Niseem
> 
> 
> On 2020-09-21 06:45, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>> Hi, Niseem,
>> The abstract looks very good. My only suggestion is to try align the
>> physics better with initial state of the Heavy ion collisions.
>> Right now you mainly talk about the final state, but I believe jet
>> tomography also constrains initial geometry (via the scaling relations) 
>> You might want to mention something about the scaling aspect and what
>> one can learn by comparing with LHC.
>> Other than this, I sign off.
>> Jiangyong
>>> On 2020-09-15 20:19, niseem via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>>>> Dear Prithwish and ShinIchi,
>>>> Please find the updated abstract at this link,
>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Niseem_IS1_21_0.pdf
>>>> For your comments,
>>>> (1) ShinIchi comments,
>>>> 1- I thought you would be also focusing various different ways of
>>>> non-flow subtractions, which you do not mention here at all, while you
>>>> do mention about the different ways of centrality definition only for
>>>> UU?
>>>>>> There is no different centrality definition I rephrased the
>>>>>> sentence to give a better understanding
>>>> 2- I would say you might like to focus on the most important
>>>> topics/point that you would like to
>>>> present, like energy dependence, system size dependence, centrality
>>>> determination and/or non-flow subtraction etc…
>>>>>> Abstract updated
>>>> 3-some more words on how this measurement would be related to the
>>>> small system vn? where we do not see clear quenching effect at least
>>>> on RAA...
>>>>>> I agree with you, p+Au got removed
>>>> (2) Prithwish comments
>>>> i- Comments on the abstract :
>>>> -using the STAR experiment —> from the STAR experiment
>>>> -Au+At at 200 —> Au+Au at 200
>>>> -“The measurements scaling features”   sounds a bit ambiguous, pls. be
>>>> specific and revise this sentence.
>>>> -constraints for—> constraints on
>>>> -upcoming O+O and p+Au runs at RHIC—>anticipated O+O run at RHIC in
>>>> the year 2021
>>>>>> All comments are considered
>>>> -Do you want to mention p+Au here ? A p+Au run at STAR/RHIC is going
>>>> to take a while, also we already have p+Au data which might create a
>>>> confusion.
>>>>>> I agree with you, p+Au got removed
>>>> -Along the line of ShinIchi's comments: adding a line on the novel
>>>> subtraction method that you use can strengthen your abstract, however,
>>>> I leave this to you.
>>>>>> I agree with you, the sentence has been updated
>>>> ii-Comments on analysis and preliminary approval:
>>>> 1. We find out what would be our policy on promising isobar data in an
>>>> abstract. If PAC’s recommendation on not showing isobar data at any
>>>> conference was specific to CME analysis, this won’t be a problem. But,
>>>> you don't have to worry -- we will clarify this from management before
>>>> the abstract is submitted.
>>>>>> Please note that the meeting will be in January and we started the
>>>>>> production I’m hoping to have final results before that. Also, as
>>>>>> you stated these only flow measurements.
>>>> 2. In your last presentation you mentioned about ongoing 27 GeV
>>>> analysis :
>>>> https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/bulkcorr/niseem/pwg_2020/High_PT_3.pdf
>>>> However, in this abstract you mentioned about 54 GeV. Do you have
>>>> plans to show/include both 27 and 54 GeV ?
>>>>>> 27 GeV added to the abstract I’m working on it now.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Niseem
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature