Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shengli Huang for ISMD2021 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shengli Huang for ISMD2021 submitted for review
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 03:52:17 +0900

Dear Shengli

Two questions, (the first one is now solved though.)

How could the experimental data 0-0.5% and 0-5% be similar in x-axis, while
0-1% point is somewhat different? I’m only talking about the x-value “beta2”
for the experimental data points. (Now I know, you have just chosen the
x-value
from model line that gives the experimental y-value, which is highly
misleading, if
you do plot the data points like this. In such case, horizontal lines for the
experimental data would be better to avoid any possible confusion as you
say.)

Why these all 3 model calculations (3 bands) can cover such a wide range of
beta2
from -0.1 to 0.4?, although the collisions systems(?) and centralities are
specified
for each model, which was my initial question about the models, that you do
not
still answer yet…

Best regards, ShinIchi

> On Jul 9, 2021, at 3:14, Shengli Huang <shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear ShinIchi,
> I have updated the slide #14. You can find the new version with same
> link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/ismd2021/exploring-deformation-nuclei-correlation-between-anisotropic-flow-and-trans-0
> Now we match the data with model calculations with the same y-axis to
> determine the beta2 value.
>
> Thanks!
> Shengli
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:20 AM Shengli Huang
> <shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu> wrote:
> Dear ShiniChi,
>
> The beta2 value is from model input. So the plot is ruo vs beta2 from three
> model calculations.
> For the star measurements, we only have the y-axis value. Maybe we should
> switch it horizontal lines to
> make it more clear.
>
> Thanks!
> Shengli
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 12:54 AM ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> Dear Shengli
> Since results are all previously approved preliminary, so I do not see any
> issue
> and therefore, would sign off. So please confirm everything are already
> shown
> and approved before. I think I’ve mentioned earlier, I would like to know
> how the
> choice of beta2 (x-axis) values for AuAu and UU for 3 different
> centralities (0-5 /
> 0-1 / 0-0.5 %) is made for the plot in page 14, are they also calculated
> separately
> for 3 different centralities for one system, although it looks like it is
> just plotted
> slightly shifted? While the model calculations are given as band as a
> function of
> beta2, so that you might need to explain how it was done.
> Best regards, ShinIchi
>
> > On Jul 8, 2021, at 0:40, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Shengli Huang (shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a material for
> > a
> > review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/55551
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page