STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>]

Dear Chunjian
Thanks for the nice slide, I would sign off with a few comments below. 

It’s very good to go step-by-step from 1) to 4) in p7, as I told you earlier, 
I would like to see just with “R0" in 3) and add “a0” in 4), that you can 
show us sometime later in the PWG. 

In p8, you are showing Glauber estimators first with open symbols and 
then later lines, it’s not clear from the slide about the difference between 
symbols and lines, while red-blue difference is clear, though. Can you also 
do this with AMPT?

In p9, you scale the experimental data by 1.015, so you might like to 
give a reasoning about this, too. You would also need to point out that 
there is one free parameter “trigger efficiency” in the Glauber fitting to 
the experimental data independently for two systems, since one excludes 
the peripheral region from the fitting, that is also the reasoning why you 
would like to scale up, I guess… We also need to think about how we 
compare these 4 different assumptions to the common data or individually…

Best regards, ShinIchi

> On Oct 30, 2021, at 7:09, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l 
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> 
> ChunJian Zhang (chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a material 
> for  
> a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/56975
> 
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l