star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review
- From: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: Chunjian Zhang <chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT icloud.com>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 09:48:50 -0400
Hello Chunjian,
I've approved your talk since it is very similar to what you've presented at the DNP. One question tough in the plots on slide#2 how did you estimate the centrality bins 0.2,1, 2% ?
These are not official centrality bins.
Best,
Prithwish
On 2021-11-04 09:23, Chunjian Zhang via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Convenors,
Hello. Just a kinder reminder. If you have no further comments on my
slides, could you please move it to Physics? Since the conference will
start EST tonight ~Thank you
Best regards
Chunjian
On Nov 2, 2021, at 7:06 PM, Chunjian Zhanghttps://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ATHIC_Nov_STAR_SBU_ChunjianZhang_v3_0.pdf
<chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu> wrote:
Dear Shinchi,
Hello. Your nice comments are considered in
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ATHIC_Nov_STAR_SBU_ChunjianZhang_v3.pdf
Thank you and best regards
Chunjian
On Nov 2, 2021, at 6:23 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Chunjian
You have 4 times page 8, which is very nice and instructive, you
added just two lines going
from 3rd to 4th times the same page, but without adding any text in
the page or legend in
the figure, so you could add a few words saying “line is nucleon
glauber and open marker
is quark glauber” somewhere in the page...
Best regards, ShinIchi
On Nov 3, 2021, at 6:35, Chunjian Zhang
<chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu> wrote:
Dear Shinlchi,
Hello. Than you for nice comments. Please find the new updates in
and my answers for addressing your comments below
It’s very good to go step-by-step from 1) to 4) in p7, as I told
you earlier,
I would like to see just with “R0" in 3) and add “a0” in 4),
that you can
show us sometime later in the PWG. You know my step by step is:
beta2—> Beta2+beta3—> beta2+beta3+a0—> beta2+beta3+R+a0;
You nice comments will be addressed in the later PWG. But I do need
time to run the cases (beta2+beta3+R). Because this is not the
approximated estimations. These are direct input.
Anyway, we can also estimate the R effect from the difference
between beta2+beta3+a0 and beta2+beta3+R+a0.
BUT. I also agree with you adding beta2+beta3+R is a good
suggestions and I will run it.
In p8, you are showing Glauber estimators first with open symbols
and
then later lines, it’s not clear from the slide about the
difference between
symbols and lines, while red-blue difference is clear, though. Can
you also
do this with AMPT?
Line is nucleon glauber and open marker is quark glauber. You can
see more smear in the tail. And the peripheral and mid-central is
identical.
We can not do it in the AMPT since AMPT the radial response of mean
pt fluctuations is not enough or weaker . So it’s hard to give the
right answers.
In p9, you scale the experimental data by 1.015, so you might like
to
give a reasoning about this, too. You would also need to point out
that
there is one free parameter “trigger efficiency” in the Glauber
fitting to
the experimental data independently for two systems, since one
excludes
the peripheral region from the fitting, that is also the reasoning
why you
would like to scale up, I guess… We also need to think about how
we
compare these 4 different assumptions to the common data or
individually…Thank you for this comment. I do need to add "! Note
the normalization is very sensitive to the trigger efficiency”
Thank you and best regards
Chunjian
On Nov 2, 2021, at 12:19 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Chunjian
Thanks for the nice slide, I would sign off with a few comments
below.
It’s very good to go step-by-step from 1) to 4) in p7, as I told
you earlier,
I would like to see just with “R0" in 3) and add “a0” in 4),
that you can
show us sometime later in the PWG.
In p8, you are showing Glauber estimators first with open symbols
and
then later lines, it’s not clear from the slide about the
difference between
symbols and lines, while red-blue difference is clear, though. Can
you also
do this with AMPT?
In p9, you scale the experimental data by 1.015, so you might like
to
give a reasoning about this, too. You would also need to point out
that
there is one free parameter “trigger efficiency” in the Glauber
fitting to
the experimental data independently for two systems, since one
excludes
the peripheral region from the fitting, that is also the reasoning
why you
would like to scale up, I guess… We also need to think about how
we
compare these 4 different assumptions to the common data or
individually…
Best regards, ShinIchi
On Oct 30, 2021, at 7:09, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
ChunJian Zhang (chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a
material for
a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/56975
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
ShinIchi Esumi, 11/02/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/02/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
ShinIchi Esumi, 11/02/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/02/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/04/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Prithwish Tribedy, 11/04/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/04/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review, Jiangyong Jia, 11/04/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review, Prithwish Tribedy, 11/04/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review, Prithwish Tribedy, 11/04/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/04/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Prithwish Tribedy, 11/04/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/04/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/02/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
ShinIchi Esumi, 11/02/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by ChunJian Zhang for ATHIC 2021 submitted for review,
Chunjian Zhang, 11/02/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.