STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>]

Dear Joey (and Kosuke)

The followings are comments on your merged talk abstract from conveners. 

Best regards, Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi

---------------------------------------

Jiangyong

too many references, suggest to limit to 3 or less.

Add STAR in the title

huge vorticity-->large global vorticity

were achieved by operating the STAR experiment in fixed-target mode-->were achieved in fixed-target collision mode.  

on y across the full range of hyperon production in y-->over a wide range in y.

no trend-->no such trend

suggested in [3] is-->Ref.[3] suggests

Delete "however, the statistics are too limited to make a significant measurement." since later you discuss 19 and 27 GeV.

Prithwish

Too many references and the most important one is missing. 

We suggest to cite “https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00044” and see if we can reduce the list of references.

“​​​​implying a huge vorticity” → “implying strong vortical structures are created” 

“In fixed-target” →”in the fixed-target”

“allowed for the measurement” → “allowed a measurement” 

“allows for the comparison to the large number of” →”allows comparison with a large number of” 

“Despite these calculations” → “In contrary to these calculations”

“on y as √s_NN is reduced” → “on y with decreasing √s_NN” 

“we see no trend within uncertainties which may challenge” → “we see no trend in data within uncertainties. Our measurements may challenge”   

“Additionally, suggested in [3] in as enhanced” → “Additionally, Ref. [3] suggests an enhancement of” 

“...beam energies; however, the statistics are too limited to make a significant measurement” 

→ 

“...beam energies. However, the statistics of our previously published datasets were limited to make a significant measurement to test such a prediction.”  

“would set the scale on the” → “would set a limit on the”

“to study the magnitude of splitting” → “to search for possible splitting” 

ShinIchi

L4: “achieved” -> “collected or acquired”

L8-9: “y” is repeated several times...

Instead of the last few sentences in the 1st paragraph, we can just say “we compared with several model calculations…” 

The 2nd paragraph is a little too long, but I agree with this discussion without any promise, as we will be able to show the difference, if we can publish before QM. 

---------------------------------------

On Nov 19, 2021, at 6:13, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Joseph Adams (adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu) has submitted a material for a  
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/57305

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l