Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Gavin Wilks for SQM 2022 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Gavin Wilks for SQM 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 17:53:29 +0800

Dear Gavin,

Nice slides. I have a few suggestions for your consideration.

Title: you can probably mention either RHIC BES-II or STAR BES-II

slide#5: seen --> observed
"conventional physical mechanisms" --> conventional physics mechanisms or, conventional
polarization mechanisms.
"phi meson vector strong force field." --> phi meson strong force field or vector meson strong force field.

slide#7: "Polarization in late stage of hadronic interactions" --> Different late stage of hadronic interactions. Because I think hadronic re-scattering can destroy the polarization signal.

"Correlations between d and s-bar fluctuating vector meson fields .... " --> fluctuating vector meson fields for d and s-bar are expected to be weaker than s and s-bar

slide#8: Remove validate BES-I. We should stress what are the improvements at BES-II than BES-I, e.g. increased statistics, better event plane resolution etc. Also later in your slides mention as a future outlook that we can increase kinematic coverage in BES-II.

slide#9: Double check the number of events from our recent BUR.
"Improvements to STAR" --> can you be specific here, increased acceptance, statistics etc.

slide#11: Mention Run-2019 inside Figure.

slide#12: "Correct yields using efficiency calculated from STAR detector and Pythia6 simulations." --> Correct yields using efficiency calculated from STAR detector simulations. We probably don't need Pythia6, since it is techical part of analysis.

Check the prime symbols after "A" and "B" in the first bullet of right box.

"is set by simulation" --> is determined by simulation

slide#13: Space between 19.6 & GeV. Inside figure mention data taking year, rapidity acceptance.

slide#14: Does the model fit include BES-II data?

slide#15: "Consistent with BES-I results." --> Stress on the improvement than consistent.

slide#17: You can remove this since you don't have any backups here.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2022-05-31 12:49 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Gavin Wilks (gwilks3 AT uic.edu) has submitted a material for a review, please
have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59782

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page