STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Rishabh,

Thanks for incorporating my suggestions. I am fine with your slides.
Two minor comments:
slide#4: √sNN (GeV)
slide#9: deuterons show

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2022-06-08 05:30 PM, Rishabh Sharma wrote:
> Dear Subhash,
>
> Thank you so much for your helpful comments.
>
> slide#4: In the datasets, you can probably indicate BES-I and BES-II.
> - Implemented
>
> slide#5: Can you add comment on the improvement in EP resolution in
> BES-II compared to BES-I? - Implemented (For a better comparison
> between the BES I and BES II I am showing only 19.6 GeV resolution. I
> will put the rest in the backup)
>
> slide#6: Are these results from 0-80% or finer centrality bins? I
> would suggest to use 0-80%. Moreover, if you can replace these 14.6
> GeV results with 19.6 GeV ones where the bad runs and centrality is
> finalized, it would be better. But I would leave it up to you. -
> Implemented (I have replaced the plots with 19.6 GeV 0-80% results)
>
> slide#7: Can you add collision system, beam energy etc details inside
> these figures? - (I have written it on top of the figure. Are you
> suggesting putting the details inside the figure?)
>
> slide#8: Can you indicate the improvement in precision in BES-II
> relative to BES-I?
> Implemented
>
> slide#9: Remove 14.6 0-30% and 30-80% plots. Mention centrality
> dependent study is underway.
> Implemented
>
> slide#10: Can you use specific range of deviation, 10-20%?
> Implemented
>
> slide#13: Indicate how much Deviation of light nuclei v2 scaling is
> observed.
> Implemented
>
> Please find the updated slides here:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59779
>
> Please let me know if you have further suggestions or comments.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Rishabh
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 4:04 PM subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Rishabh,
> >
> > Nice slides.
> > It was recommended by the management to release only 0-80%
> > centrality
> > results for 14.6 GeV. Please remove the corresponding v2 results in
> > 0-30% and 30-80%.
> >
> > slide#4: In the datasets, you can probably indicate BES-I and
> > BES-II.
> >
> > slide#5: Can you add comment on the improvement in EP resolution in
> > BES-II compared to BES-I?
> >
> > slide#6: Are these results from 0-80% or finer centrality bins? I
> > would
> > suggest to use 0-80%. Moreover, if you can replace these 14.6 GeV
> > results with 19.6 GeV ones where the bad runs and centrality is
> > finalized, it would be better. But I would leave it up to you.
> >
> > slide#7: Can you add collision system, beam energy etc details
> > inside
> > these figures?
> >
> > slide#8: Can you indicate the improvement in precision in BES-II
> > relative to BES-I?
> >
> > slide#9: Remove 14.6 0-30% and 30-80% plots. Mention centrality
> > dependent study is underway.
> >
> > slide#10: Can you use specific range of deviation, 10-20%?
> >
> > slide#13: Indicate how much Deviation of light nuclei v2 scaling is
> > observed.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Subhash
> >
> > On 2022-05-31 11:42 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Rishabh Sharma (rishabhsharma AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has
> > > submitted a
> > > material for a review, please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59779
> > >
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l