STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Rishabh Sharma <rishabhsharma AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in>]

Dear Subhash,

Thank you so much for your helpful comments.

slide#4: In the datasets, you can probably indicate BES-I and BES-II. - Implemented

slide#5: Can you add comment on the improvement in EP resolution in BES-II compared to BES-I? - Implemented (For a better comparison between the BES I and BES II I am showing only 19.6 GeV resolution. I will put the rest in the backup)

slide#6: Are these results from 0-80% or finer centrality bins? I would suggest to use 0-80%. Moreover, if you can replace these 14.6 GeV results with 19.6 GeV ones where the bad runs and centrality is finalized, it would be better. But I would leave it up to you. - Implemented (I have replaced the plots with 19.6 GeV 0-80% results)

slide#7: Can you add collision system, beam energy etc details inside these figures? - (I have written it on top of the figure. Are you suggesting putting the details inside the figure?)

slide#8: Can you indicate the improvement in precision in BES-II relative to BES-I?
Implemented

slide#9: Remove 14.6 0-30% and 30-80% plots. Mention centrality dependent study is underway.
Implemented

slide#10: Can you use specific range of deviation, 10-20%?
Implemented

slide#13: Indicate how much Deviation of light nuclei v2 scaling is observed.
Implemented

Please find the updated slides here: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59779

Please let me know if you have further suggestions or comments.

Thanks and regards, 

Rishabh 

On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 4:04 PM subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Rishabh,

Nice slides.
It was recommended by the management to release only 0-80% centrality
results for 14.6 GeV. Please remove the corresponding v2 results in
0-30% and 30-80%.

slide#4: In the datasets, you can probably indicate BES-I and BES-II.

slide#5: Can you add comment on the improvement in EP resolution in
BES-II compared to BES-I?

slide#6: Are these results from 0-80% or finer centrality bins? I would
suggest to use 0-80%. Moreover, if you can replace these 14.6 GeV
results with 19.6 GeV ones where the bad runs and centrality is
finalized, it would be better. But I would leave it up to you.

slide#7: Can you add collision system, beam energy etc details inside
these figures?

slide#8: Can you indicate the improvement in precision in BES-II
relative to BES-I?

slide#9: Remove 14.6 0-30% and 30-80% plots. Mention centrality
dependent study is underway.

slide#10: Can you use specific range of deviation, 10-20%?

slide#13: Indicate how much Deviation of light nuclei v2 scaling is
observed.


Thanks and regards,
Subhash


On 2022-05-31 11:42 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Rishabh Sharma (rishabhsharma AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has
> submitted a
> material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59779
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l