STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Robertson, Charles William" <rober558 AT purdue.edu>]

Thank you for your comments and approval! 

I have updated the abstract, and it's uploaded to the original node.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DNP2022Abs_Rpsi2_v3.pdf

-CW 

---

From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:43 PM
To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Charles Robertson for DNP 2022 submitted for review

 

---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data ----


Dear CWR,
  Thanks for posting the improved version. I sign off this version with a
few minor comments.

General comment:
I am not sure "alternative R observable" is the best choice here. I feel
a bit uneasy as it sounds like we have now two different variants of the
R observable. How about saying "modified R observable" everywhere?
You're being very explicit about what is the modification -- so, it's
good.

Some more minor comments:
" charge  separation  (∆S)  fluctuations " --> " fluctuations of charge
separation  (∆S)" or you can just say "charge separation"
"energy" --> "energy of"
You need to add something like "The collection of tracks in" or the
"list of tracks in" before "Each  event  measured.."

Best,
Prithwish





On 2022-06-27 11:06, Robertson, Charles William via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Thank you for your approval and comments.
>
>  The updated version is here:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DNP2022Abs_Rpsi2_v2.pdf
>
>  -CW
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
> subhash via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 11:17 AM
> To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Charles Robertson for
> DNP 2022 submitted for review
>
> ---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing
> data ----
>
> Dear Charles,
>
> After consulting with CME focus group conveners, our recommendation is
> to remove "improved" from the title and in the main text. In the main
> text (line 19-20),  you can use something like variants of
> R-correlator,
> or an alternative approach for R-observable. We are approving this
> abstract with the presumption that there is plenty of time to reach a
> consensus on the presentation of results within STAR.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2022-06-25 09:20 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
>> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Charles Robertson (rober558 AT purdue.edu) has submitted a material for
> a
>> review, please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60055
>>
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l