Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Alexey Povarov for Nucleus-2022 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Alexey Povarov for Nucleus-2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:35:11 +0800

Dear Alexey,

Nice results. I have following comments to your slides:

You have three duplicate entries in Drupal. I am discarding the following ones:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60123
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60124

General:
Is this triangular flow measurements are new preliminaries that will be shown for the first time? If yes, could you please provide us a document with a following format:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Prelim_Request_template.pdf

It would be good into indicate BES-I/BES-II in all the relevant results and slides. Recently STAR released a lot of BES-II measurements, so it would help distinguish BES-I and BES-II.

Title: You can indicate BES-I here as well.

slide#3: Probably you can apply formatting to the bullets, so the words will have equal spacing.
baryons then mesons --> baryons than mesons

slide#5: It would be good to indicate BES-I vs BES-II. For BES-I resolutions, are you using published values or, are they from your own analysis?

slide#6: Are these v2 values from published results? If yes, please add the journal reference.
"Elliptic flow is more dependent on centrality than triangular flow" --> Elliptic flow has stronger dependence on centrality than triangular flow

slide#7: How do you calculate integrated v2, would be good to indicate them like you do on slide#6. Do you use corrected pt spectra for example?

slide#8: Indicate BES-I and BES-II in relevant figures.
First measurement of identified particle v3 at BES energies.

slide#9: You can also add scaling holds better for particles than anti-particles. Is there a way you can quantify the quality of scaling?

slide#10&11: positively charged particle species

v3 results (not corrected for efficiency) --> Do you expect any significant change in v3 due to application of efficiency. If not, you can change this "not corrected for efficiency" to a normal (not bold) font.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash



On 2022-06-30 05:53 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Alexey Povarov (povarovas AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60125

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page