STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Joey,

Thanks for addressing my comments.
I am signing it off and sending to star-talks.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2022-07-26 11:42 PM, Adams, Joseph R. wrote:
> Hi Subhash,
>
>  Thanks for the comments; I've uploaded the edited draft.
>
>  I agree that it would be nice to have a figure, but I'm very tight on
> space considering all of the different results that need to be
> discussed. I would also argue it's not that necessary in my case,
> because (1) many of the results being discussed are shown in posters
> and have plots shown in others' proceedings, and (2) the stuff _not_
> shown in others' posters include the 3 GeV result which is published
> already and the splitting "results" at 19.6 and 27 GeV which include a
> second preliminary (oops!!) and will be irrelevant as soon as the
> actual results are published. If you or others feel strongly, though,
> I'm open to including them.
>
> Best,
>
> - Joey
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2022 12:34 AM
> To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Cc: Adams, Joseph R. <adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Joseph Adams for Quark
> Matter 2022 submitted for review
>
> Dear Joey,
>
> Very nicely written proceedings and I enjoy reading it. I have a few
> comments for your consideration:
>
> In general, we include physics figures in the proceedings, especially
> new measurements. I understand there are substantial number figures
> and
> you probably try to avoid it due to page limit.
>
> The abstract can be shortened a bit.
>
> line 77: these discussions (?)
>
> line 82: mass-square information
>
> line 84: "a series of conditions" --> You could mention
> KFP/helix/topology cuts and/or refer to previous studies.
>
> line. 85: quite pure --> You could add typical purity achieved.
>
> line 90: double the resolution --> Do you mean Psi1?
>
> line 95: how about saying traditional invariant mass-method?
>
> line 154: you could mention "within uncertainties."
>
> line 167: I don't understand what do you mean by "there also recover
> the
> familiar differential dependencies." You could rephrase it.
>
> line 176: voriticity formation within the medium formed in heavy ion
> collisions.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2022-07-22 11:59 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Joseph Adams (adams.1940 AT buckeyemail.osu.edu) has submitted a
> material
> > for a
> > review, please have a look:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60374__;!!KGKeukY!x1zQfgRn-I12XM-RfdKnaciJNx4hnazvlgVQhtugf7ntBof69nGvSy2adxOhfEb4XmgGu4zp4fo7F21ONYbK_DYtfvyfbdhb6RgPgA$
> [1]
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l__;!!KGKeukY!x1zQfgRn-I12XM-RfdKnaciJNx4hnazvlgVQhtugf7ntBof69nGvSy2adxOhfEb4XmgGu4zp4fo7F21ONYbK_DYtfvyfbdhBxybJAw$
> [2]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60374__;!!KGKeukY!x1zQfgRn-I12XM-RfdKnaciJNx4hnazvlgVQhtugf7ntBof69nGvSy2adxOhfEb4XmgGu4zp4fo7F21ONYbK_DYtfvyfbdhb6RgPgA$
> [2] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l__;!!KGKeukY!x1zQfgRn-I12XM-RfdKnaciJNx4hnazvlgVQhtugf7ntBof69nGvSy2adxOhfEb4XmgGu4zp4fo7F21ONYbK_DYtfvyfbdhBxybJAw$